Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

10:30
Analysis of Tubular Membrane Networks in Cardiac Myocytes from Atria and Ventricles
Published on: October 15, 2014
20.5K
The Pfannenstiel-approach - from 1900 until 2024
Axel Gänsslen1,2, Jan Lindahl3, Mario Staresinic4
1Trauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. dr.gaensslen@gmx.de.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
|October 4, 2024
Summary
The Pfannenstiel approach for pelvic ring injuries has evolved significantly from its gynecological origins. Current surgical practice favors a modified supra-symphyseal crosscut technique over the classical approach.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- The Pfannenstiel approach is commonly used for pelvic ring injuries, particularly symphyseal plating.
- Its original description was for gynecological cesarean sections, involving transverse rectus abdominis muscle dissection.
- Current surgical practice has diverged from this classical method.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the evolution of the Pfannenstiel approach in treating pelvic ring injuries.
- To highlight the shift towards a modified supra-symphyseal crosscut technique.
- To propose renaming the approach to reflect current surgical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of surgical literature and common practices for pelvic ring injury treatment.
- Comparison of the original Pfannenstiel approach with current techniques used by pelvic surgeons.
- Analysis of fascial incision methods (transverse vs. longitudinal).
Main Results:
- Current pelvic surgery trends show a move away from the original transverse rectus abdominis dissection.
- A supra-symphyseal crosscut approach with a longitudinal fascial incision is increasingly favored.
- Transverse fascial incisions of the rectus sheaths are rarely performed.
Conclusions:
- The term "Pfannenstiel approach" is no longer accurate for current symphyseal plating techniques.
- The modified supra-symphyseal crosscut approach, as described by Küstner, better represents current practice.
- Renaming the approach to "modified Pfannenstiel approach" is recommended for clarity.

