Toxicity of paclobutrazol-based pesticide on Lactuca sativa L.: germination, seedling development, and DNA damage

Paclobutrazol, a fungicide of the triazole class, is widely used as an inducer of early flowering and fruiting by inhibiting gibberellin formation. However, biological assays using model organisms to evaluate their cytogenotoxic and mutagenic potential are still scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of the commercial product Cultar® 250 SC (CP) and the pure substance (PBZ) on the germination and initial seedling development of Lactuca sativa L. (lettuce), in addition to evaluating the effects of CP on the mitotic activity and DNA, as we believe that PBZ has a greater toxic potential than CP on seed germination, and that the latter has cytogenotoxic and mutagenic effects on L. sativa. Lettuce seeds treated with CP and with PBZ in the doses of 0.25, 0.50, 1, 1.5, and 2 g L^-1 showed significant reductions in germination rate, as well the CP reduced the root and initial development seedling development. PBZ showed greater inhibition of germination compared to CP. In direct exposure to PBZ, there was not sufficient seedling development for analysis, while in discontinuous treatment, there was inhibition of root growth (except for doses of 0.25 and 0.50 g L^-1) and in the development of the aerial part. While no mitodepressive effect was observed in meristematic cells treated with CP, increased frequencies of chromosomal alterations, including condensed nuclei and micronuclei, were evident in both meristematic cells and the F1 region. The Comet assay further demonstrated higher levels of DNA damage at higher paclobutrazol doses, supporting the findings of increased micronucleus frequencies. Consequently, it can be concluded that the CP exhibits greater toxicity towards seed germination compared to lettuce seedlings, and PBZ has a greater toxic potential than CP in relation to these parameters. However, the impact of CP on seedlings was relatively minimal, as evidenced by their limited effects on development, cell proliferation, and DNA, suggesting a slight toxicity of this agent. Therefore, we infer that Cultar® 250 SC should be used with caution. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of employing joint analyses to better elucidate and correlate the mechanisms of action of potentially toxic substances. Furthermore, it provides a basis for discussing the application of Cultar® 250 SC and seeking more sustainable alternatives in food production.