Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions
Theodore Masters-Waage1, Christiane Spitzmueller2, Ebenezer Edema-Sillo1
1Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Underrepresented minority (URM) faculty face challenges in many domains of academia, from university admissions to grant applications. We examine whether this translates to promotion and tenure (P&T) decisions. Data from five US universities on 1,571 faculty members' P&T decisions show that URM faculty received 7% more negative votes and were 44% less likely to receive unanimous votes from P&T committees. A double standard in how scholarly productivity is rewarded is also observed, with below-average h-indexes being judged more harshly for URM faculty than for non-URM faculty. This relationship is amplified for faculty with intersectional backgrounds, especially URM women. The differential treatment of URM women was mitigated when external reviewers highlighted candidates' scholarship more in their review letters. In sum, the results support the double standard hypothesis and provide evidence that different outcomes in P&T decision-making processes contribute to the sustained underrepresentation of URM faculty in tenured faculty positions.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Confirmation Biases
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Stereotype Content Model
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
The Representativeness Heuristic

