Characterising umbrella reviews in paediatrics: A systematic analysis

Ilari Kuitunen1,2

  • 1Institute of Clinical Medicine and Kuopio Pediatric Research Unit, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Insights

Practices in pediatric umbrella reviews vary. Improved adherence to guidelines for conducting and reporting these reviews, especially for critical appraisal, is necessary for better research synthesis.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Research
  • Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

  • Umbrella reviews synthesize evidence from multiple systematic reviews on a specific topic.
  • Standardized reporting and methodological quality are crucial for reliable synthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize current practices in conducting and reporting pediatric umbrella reviews.
  • To identify areas for improvement in methodology and reporting.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted for umbrella reviews on pediatric topics (0-18 years) published between January 2020 and June 2024.
  • Included reviews were assessed for reporting standards, results summarization, and critical appraisal techniques.

Main Results:

  • Ninety-nine umbrella reviews were included, focusing on interventions (49) or epidemiology (50).
  • The median number of included reviews was 18; statistical synthesis was used in 32 reviews.
  • Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) was the most common critical appraisal tool (n=56).

Conclusions:

  • Pediatric umbrella reviews exhibit heterogeneous reporting and methodological characteristics.
  • Enhanced adherence to established guidelines is recommended, particularly for critical appraisal methods.
  • Improving consistency will strengthen the reliability and utility of pediatric umbrella reviews.
Abstract