Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

A Saline/Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy Device As an Adjunct for Hemostasis in Solid Organ Injury/Trauma
Published on: July 28, 2020
Contemporary National Trend in Surgical Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Pediatric Blunt Splenic Injury
R Scott Eldredge1, David M Notrica1, Todd Nickoles2
1Phoenix Children's, Division of Pediatric Surgery, 1919 E Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Mayo Clinic, Department of General Surgery, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Background:
Evaluation of response to blood transfusion after blunt splenic injury (BSI) may prevent the need for splenectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with splenectomy in pediatric patients with isolated BSI who presented with hemodynamic instability with a focus on timing of transfusion.
Methods:
The 2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Project database was queried for children ≤18 years with BSI who arrived with a shock index>1.1. Interfacility transfer patients and those with additional intra-abdominal injuries were excluded. Demographic, injury characteristic and timing, transfusion, operative, and outcome data were collected. A sub-analysis of patients without brain injury was also performed.
Results:
516 patients met inclusion criteria; 60.1% were male, with mean age 12.3 ± 5.5 years. Initial mean shock index was 1.4 ± 0.4, ISS was 31.7 ± 15.1, and GCS was 10.7 ± 5. Splenectomy occurred in 27% of patients. Among splenectomy patients, 26.2% did not receive blood prior to splenectomy. While treatment at a pediatric trauma center showed an increased OR of splenectomy in univariable analysis, when controlling for lack of transfusion, no differences in splenectomy persisted. Patient Age (aOR-1.26, p < 0.001), BSI grade (aOR-2.30, P < 0.001), male gender, (aOR-2.2, p = 0.003), being non-white (aOR-2.0) ISS (aOR-1.03, p = 0.003), and GCS (aOR-0.95, p = 0.034) were associated with splenectomy.
Conclusion:
More than 26% of patients undergoing splenectomy did not receive blood prior to surgery. Differences in risk of splenectomy by center type seen on univariable analysis were not seen when controlling for transfusion. Evaluating response to blood transfusion may be an opportunity to reduce the frequency of splenectomy.
Level Of Evidence:
Treatment Study Level III.
More Related Videos
02:09Application of Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy with Total Blood Flow Occlusion in Benign Splenic Lesions
Published on: December 20, 2024
04:00Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Pericardial Devascularization for Hypersplenism and Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Due to Portal Hypertension
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care