Effect of volumetric concentration factor on virus removal for low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane in drinking...

Reverse osmosis membranes are intended to constitute a complete physical barrier against nanometric-sized pathogens such as enteric viruses. Literature describes that low-pressure reverse osmosis achieves high viral removal rates (above 5 log), surpassing those of ultrafiltration (1 to 3 log). However, these studies often used individual viruses and high feed viral concentrations (above 10⁹ virus L^-1), greater than typical viral concentrations present in the environment like groundwater, to promote virus detection in the permeate. These high concentrations can promote viral aggregation, potentially affecting the observed retention. This work evaluates the simultaneous elimination of three viruses during the production of drinking water by low-pressure reverse osmosis: two enteric viruses (adenovirus 41 and coxsackievirus-B5) and bacteriophage MS2, a widely used virus surrogate in the literature. The permeates produced by low-pressure reverse osmosis were concentrated to allow virus detection in permeate at lower feed concentrations (10⁶ virus L^-1) while staying above the limits of detection and quantification. Experiments were carried out on two pilot plants of different scales (laboratory and semi-industrial) to assess the potential effect of the number of membranes and O-rings on virus retention. The effect of the volume concentration factor on low-pressure reverse osmosis efficiency was evaluated for each scale. Results indicate an average viral reduction of 6 log (up to 7 log), regardless of the size of the virus and/or the scale of LPRO pilot. For the semi-industrial scale, better retention was observed as the volume concentration factor increased. However, viruses were still present in the permeate for each scale (even if close to the detection limit), indicating that retention was not complete. At the same feed viral concentrations, the number of viruses recovered in the semi-industrial scale permeates was higher than in the laboratory scale. A 24-fold greater number of membranes and O-rings used for the semi-industrial scale showed that micro-leaks through O-rings could be responsible for the passage of viruses into the permeate.