Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Risk Assessment of Selected CCS Wells through Feature, Event, and Process Method and Comparison of the Barrier Effect
Khizar Abid1, Catalin Teodoriu1, Muhammad Syafeeq Bin Ebining Amir2
1Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Sarkeys Energy Building, Rm 1210, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States.
Abstract:
To reduce the CO2 release in the atmosphere, the carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technique presents a solution in which the CO2 is captured from the emitting source and injected into a suitable geological formation in the subsurface. For the CCS project to be successful, CO2 must be trapped underground for hundreds of years. In that respect, good integrity plays an important role as it ensures that the injected CO2 remains sequestrated in the subsurface. Hence, this study presents a risk assessment technique with the help of which critical elements that can compromise the integrity of the CCS well can be identified. The approach taken for the risk assessment is based on the feature, event, and process (FEP). However, this method gives a qualitative analysis, and to convert it to a semiquantitative one, FEP is integrated with an interaction matrix, incident potential matrix (IPM), and cause-effect plot diagram. In this paper, risk assessment was conducted on two fictitious wells with different well configurations. It was found that cement and casing were the most vulnerable components, while formation water and subsidence were the most problematic elements in the given well system. It was also concluded that the number of plugs and their location in the well could increase or decrease the intensity of the risk levels in the CCS wells.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Rate
Censoring Survival Data
Introduction to Statistical Process Control
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

