Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
A qualitative exploration of the assessment process to cochlear implantation for children with hearing loss
Amanda J Hall1, Briony Dillon1, Helen Pryce1
1Department of Audiology, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Insights
Parental capacity significantly impacts early cochlear implantation for children with hearing loss. Support systems are crucial for managing the assessment workload and improving access to timely pediatric cochlear implant services.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Pediatric Otolaryngology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Paediatric cochlear implantation is a complex process requiring extensive assessment.
- Understanding the family's experience is vital for optimizing service delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the paediatric cochlear implant assessment journey from referral to implantation.
- To examine this process from the perspectives of parents and professionals, and through direct observation.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative approach utilizing grounded theory methodology.
- Interviews with 12 families and 6 professionals.
- Ethnographic observations of assessment clinics.
Main Results:
- A core theme emerged concerning the 'work' involved in cochlear implant assessment for families.
- The interplay between assessment workload and parental capacity influences access to early implantation.
- Factors like child's needs, social support, and health literacy affect parental capacity.
Conclusions:
- The Burden of Treatment theory provides a useful model for understanding access to paediatric cochlear implantation.
- Findings highlight the need for tailored support to help families manage the assessment process.
- Implications exist for refining the delivery of paediatric cochlear implant services.
Objective:
To explore the process of paediatric cochlear implant assessment, from referral to implantation, from the perspective of parents, cochlear implant professionals, and through observations of clinics.
Design:
Qualitative approach, using grounded theory methodology.
Study Sample:
Twelve families with children under 5 years with permanent hearing loss referred for a cochlear implant or received an implant in the past year, and six professionals who refer or assess children for cochlear implants. Data collection involved interviews and ethnographic observations of assessment clinics.
Results:
The core theme derived from interview and observation data related to the work of the cochlear implant assessment for families. The relationship between the work generated by the assessment process and capacity of parents to do the work provides a model to examine access to early implantation, consistent with the Burden of Treatment theory. We identified variation in terms of workload, relating to factors such as a child's additional needs or number of appointments required, and in terms of capacity, relating to factors such as social circumstances or health literacy. Social, peer and professional support and information helped families manage the workload.
Conclusions:
Findings have implications for delivery of paediatric cochlear implant services.
