Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program (IATP) for alcohol use disorder: Comparison with conventional...

This study tested a highly individualized cognitive-behavioral coping skills treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Recent studies have indicated that coping skills training programs are not always effective. A possible explanation is that the training provided in these programs may not address the specific needs of the patient. The Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program (IATP) was intended to provide a highly individualized approach to the training of skills most relevant for each individual.

Men and women with AUD (N = 173) were randomly assigned to one of three, manualized, 12-session treatments: IATP, a conventional (Packaged) cognitive-behavioral program (PCBT), or a Case Management control condition (CaseM). An experience sampling (ES) procedure was employed prior to, and during, treatment to record alcohol use and coping behaviors in all patients. In IATP, this information was used by therapists to plan treatment that would address the specific strengths and weaknesses of each patient in alcohol-use situations. ES data were collected at multiple time points and patients were followed every 3 months out to 21 months posttreatment.

Multilevel model analyses indicated that IATP yielded better drinking outcomes than the CaseM or PCBT conditions. Mediation analyses indicated that the effects of IATP versus the other treatments on outcomes were accounted for at least partly by changes in active coping with high-risk situations.

Due to the limited diversity of the sample, generalizability of the results may be limited. Results are discussed in terms of the importance of tailoring treatment for the individual patient. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).