Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Cost-Effectiveness And Health Impact Of Increasing Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness In The US
Christopher Weyant1, Amber Lin2, Craig D Newgard3
1Christopher Weyant, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Insights
Improving emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness significantly enhances child survival, offering substantial quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a cost-effective rate. National implementation is a highly cost-effective strategy for improving pediatric emergency care.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Emergency department (ED) care quality for children in the US is inconsistent.
- The National Pediatric Readiness Project seeks to improve pediatric emergency care outcomes.
- Variability in ED readiness impacts pediatric patient survival rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of enhancing pediatric readiness in US emergency departments.
- To quantify the health and economic impact of improving ED pediatric readiness.
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of achieving high pediatric readiness nationally.
Main Methods:
- A decision-analytic simulation model was utilized.
- Data from a nationally representative cohort of 747 EDs across eleven states were used for clinical and cost parameters.
- Lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated from a healthcare sector perspective with a 3% discount rate.
- Probabilistic, one-way, and subgroup sensitivity analyses were performed.
Main Results:
- Increasing ED pediatric readiness yielded 69,100 QALYs for the eleven-state cohort at an ICER of $9,300 per QALY gained.
- Achieving high pediatric readiness nationally is projected to yield 179,000 QALYs at the same ICER, with estimated implementation costs of $260 million.
- Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.
Conclusions:
- Implementing high ED pediatric readiness across all US EDs is a highly cost-effective strategy.
- Improving pediatric readiness in emergency departments offers significant improvements in child survival and quality of life.
- Investment in national pediatric readiness is recommended to enhance emergency care for children.
Abstract:
The quality of emergency department (ED) care for children in the US is highly variable. The National Pediatric Readiness Project aims to improve survival for children receiving emergency services. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of increasing ED pediatric readiness, using a decision-analytic simulation model. Previously published primary analyses of a nationally representative, population-based cohort of children receiving emergency services at 747 EDs in eleven states provided clinical and cost parameters. From a health care sector perspective, we used a 3 percent annual discount rate and quantified lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We performed probabilistic, one-way, and subgroup sensitivity analyses. Increasing ED pediatric readiness yields 69,100 QALYs for the eleven-state cohort, costing $9,300 per QALY gained. Achieving high readiness nationally yields 179,000 QALYs at the same ICER (with implementation costs of approximately $260 million). Implementing high ED pediatric readiness for all EDs in the US is highly cost-effective.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...

