Prognostic Impact of Target Vessel in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Emil Nielsen Holck1, Lars Jakosen2, Lone Juul-Hune Mogensen3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Hospitalsenheden Midt, Viborg, Denmark.

PubMed

Insights

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery shows similar outcomes to non-CTO LAD PCI. However, unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI is linked to significantly poorer prognosis, highlighting LAD CTO as a high-risk condition.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery aims to improve patient outcomes.
  • Existing data suggest variable benefits of invasive treatment for non-CTO LAD lesions.
  • The prognostic impact of CTO revascularization, stratified by target vessel, requires further investigation compared to non-CTO LAD PCI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prognostic impact of CTO revascularization stratified by target treated vessel compared with non-CTO LAD PCI.
  • To test the hypothesis that successful PCI of LAD CTO and non-LAD CTO, and unsuccessful non-LAD CTO, are associated with similar prognoses as non-CTO LAD lesions.
  • To determine if unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI is associated with a poorer prognosis.

Main Methods:

  • Population-based cohort study including 21,141 patients undergoing PCI from 2009 to 2019 in the Central Denmark Region.
  • Exclusion of patients with acute myocardial infarction within 30 days.
  • Stratification of CTO patients by occluded vessel and procedural success, with long-term all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint.

Main Results:

  • Successful PCI for both LAD CTO and non-LAD CTO showed similar adjusted risks for all-cause mortality compared to non-CTO LAD PCI (LAD CTO HR 1.14 [0.90-1.44]; non-LAD CTO HR 1.09 [0.95-1.27]).
  • Unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.88 [1.33-2.65]) compared to non-CTO LAD PCI.
  • Unsuccessful non-LAD CTO PCI did not show a significantly higher risk (HR 1.26 [0.97-1.63]) compared to non-CTO LAD PCI.

Conclusions:

  • Successful PCI for both LAD and non-LAD CTOs confers a similar long-term prognosis as non-CTO LAD PCI.
  • Only unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI is associated with a poorer prognosis, identifying LAD CTO patients as a high-risk population.
  • Dedicated CTO trials are needed to confirm these findings and inform guideline recommendations for LAD CTO management.