Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gravity between Spherical Bodies01:27

Gravity between Spherical Bodies

8.4K
Newton's law of gravitation describes the gravitational force between any two point masses. However, for extended spherical objects like the Earth, the Moon, and other planets, the law holds with an assumption that masses of spherical objects are concentrated at their respective centers.
This assumption can be proved easily by showing that the expression for gravitational potential energy between a hollow sphere of mass (M) and a point mass (m) is the same as it would be for a pair of extended...
8.4K
Geoid and Ellipsoid01:28

Geoid and Ellipsoid

28
The Earth's shape is best described as an ellipsoid, a slightly flattened sphere created by rotating an ellipse around its minor axis. This flattening results in the polar axis being about 21 kilometers shorter than the equatorial axis. In contrast, the geoid represents the Earth's gravitational shape and aligns with the mean sea level (MSL). The geoid is an irregular equipotential surface where gravity is perpendicular at every point. Variations in Earth's mass distribution cause geoid...
28
Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface01:20

Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface

2.4K
An object's apparent weight is its weight measured by a spring balance at its location. It is different from its true weight, the force with which the Earth pulls it, because of the Earth's rotation. Mathematically, an object's apparent weight equals its true weight minus the centripetal force that keeps it in a circular motion along with the Earth's surface every 24 hours.
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's...
2.4K
Center of Gravity00:58

Center of Gravity

4.9K
The center of gravity (COG) of an object is the point where the object's total weight is considered to be concentrated. Knowing the location of the center of gravity is useful when predicting the behavior of a moving object or designing static structures. In a uniform gravitational field, the center of gravity is similar to the center of mass (COM); yet, these two points can be positioned differently. For example, the Moon's center of mass lies very close to its geometric center, but...
4.9K
Gauss's Law: Cylindrical Symmetry01:20

Gauss's Law: Cylindrical Symmetry

7.5K
A charge distribution has cylindrical symmetry if the charge density depends only upon the distance from the axis of the cylinder and does not vary along the axis or with the direction about the axis. In other words, if a system varies if it is rotated around the axis or shifted along the axis, it does not have cylindrical symmetry. In real systems, we do not have infinite cylinders; however, if the cylindrical object is considerably longer than the radius from it that we are interested in,...
7.5K
Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry01:27

Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry

7.9K
A planar symmetry of charge density is obtained when charges are uniformly spread over a large flat surface. In planar symmetry, all points in a plane parallel to the plane of charge are identical with respect to the charges. Suppose the plane of the charge distribution is the xy-plane, and the electric field at a space point P with coordinates (x, y, z) is to be determined. Since the charge density is the same at all (x, y) - coordinates in the z = 0 plane, by symmetry, the electric field at P...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representational momentum beyond the target?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Does across-trial target behavior influence representational momentum?

Perception·2024
Same author

Setting the scene for boundary extension: Methods, findings, connections, and theories.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Does a concurrent motor process influence representational momentum?

Perception·2023
Same author

The possibility of an impetus heuristic.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Representational gravity: Empirical findings and theoretical implications.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
06:30

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2020

5.8K

Anisotropies related to representational gravity.

Timothy L Hubbard1, Susan E Ruppel2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. timothyleehubbard@gmail.com.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|October 7, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Representational gravity causes memory for target locations to shift downward, especially for the top edge. This effect varies with target size, height, and motion, impacting spatial representation.

Keywords:
AnisotropyDisplacementRepresentational gravitySpatial representationVisual space

More Related Videos

Coherence between Brain Cortical Function and Neurocognitive Performance during Changed Gravity Conditions
12:29

Coherence between Brain Cortical Function and Neurocognitive Performance during Changed Gravity Conditions

Published on: May 23, 2011

19.5K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

25.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
06:30

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2020

5.8K
Coherence between Brain Cortical Function and Neurocognitive Performance during Changed Gravity Conditions
12:29

Coherence between Brain Cortical Function and Neurocognitive Performance during Changed Gravity Conditions

Published on: May 23, 2011

19.5K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

25.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Spatial Memory

Background:

  • Representational gravity describes memory displacement towards implied gravitational pull.
  • Previous research explored representational momentum for moving objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if representational gravity effects are uniform across a target's extent.
  • To examine how target characteristics (size, height, motion) influence representational gravity.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed stationary or moving targets of varying sizes and heights.
  • Memory for the top and bottom edges of targets was tested after viewing.
  • Implied gravitational attraction was directed downwards.

Main Results:

  • Significant anisotropies were observed: top edges displaced downward, bottom edges showed no or upward displacement.
  • Vertical anisotropies were unaffected by knowing which edge to remember or vertical target motion.
  • Horizontal target motion showed a trend towards reduced vertical anisotropies.
  • Larger and higher stationary targets yielded greater displacement, but motion diminished these effects.

Conclusions:

  • Representational gravity is anisotropic, with differential effects on target edges.
  • Findings align with representational momentum, suggesting shared mechanisms for spatial representation.
  • Anisotropies have implications for understanding spatial perception and environmental interaction.