Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interval Timing Is Altered in Male Nrxn1<sup>+/-</sup> Mice: A Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2026
Same author

Mice extrapolate temporal information based on previously learned spatiotemporal mappings: An asymmetrical case.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same author

Psychophysical dissection of temporal error monitoring.

Cognitive processing·2025
Same author

Asymmetrical monitoring of subjective asynchronies: a metacognitive generalized STEARC effect.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Temporal foreknowledge: Anticipation and prospective correction of timing errors by diffusion.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

A rudimentary form of time-dependent awareness in mice.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.3K

Mice monitor their timing errors.

Tutku Öztel1,2, Fuat Balcı3,4,5

  • 1Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Scientific Reports
|October 7, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Mice can monitor their timing errors, showing human-like metacognitive abilities. They adjust reward expectations based on temporal accuracy, demonstrating temporal error monitoring.

Keywords:
Animal behaviorHigher order cognitionInterval timingResponse rateTemporal error monitoring

More Related Videos

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
10:07

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice

Published on: May 29, 2013

100.0K
The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
09:15

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice

Published on: February 4, 2015

27.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.3K
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
10:07

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice

Published on: May 29, 2013

100.0K
The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
09:15

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice

Published on: February 4, 2015

27.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Animal behavior
  • Comparative psychology

Background:

  • Animals exhibit goal-directed behaviors influenced by representational uncertainty.
  • Temporal error monitoring, or tracking timing inaccuracies, is crucial for adaptive behavior.
  • Limited research exists on non-human animals' temporal error monitoring capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate temporal error monitoring in mice.
  • To determine if mice can track the direction and magnitude of their timing errors.
  • To assess metacognitive sensitivity to temporal inaccuracies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel behavioral task for temporal production in mice.
  • Minimized sensorimotor noise and favored temporal accuracy.
  • Used reward expectancy as a proxy for confidence in timing performance.

Main Results:

  • Mice showed high reward expectancy after accurate timing and low expectancy after inaccurate timing.
  • Reward expectancy decreased symmetrically with deviations from the target interval (shorter or longer).
  • Mice demonstrated sensitivity to both under- and overproduction of time intervals.

Conclusions:

  • Mice possess a complete temporal error monitoring ability.
  • Mouse metacognition exhibits human-like sensitivity to temporal errors.
  • Findings advance understanding of metacognition in non-human animals.