Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

3.8K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.8K
Biostatistics: Overview01:20

Biostatistics: Overview

227
Biostatistics plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing data in healthcare and biology. Biostatisticians conduct experiments, gather evidence, and draw meaningful conclusions using statistical methods and techniques. Different variables form the foundation of biostatistical analysis, allowing researchers to understand and interpret data effectively. These variables are classified into different types, each serving a specific purpose in statistical analysis.
Discrete variables are...
227
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

167
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
167
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

101
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
101
Random Error01:04

Random Error

843
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
843
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

117
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
117

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Distinguishing AKI from CKD: outcomes and characteristics of patients with abnormal serum creatinine and no known baseline.

BMC nephrology·2026
Same author

Weight trajectories throughout adulthood and prostate cancer incidence, aggressiveness, and death in 258 494 men.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Dissecting the effect of long-term exposure to air pollution on risk of dementia in UK Biobank.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2025
Same author

Acute effects of daylight saving time clock changes on mental and physical health in England: population based retrospective cohort study.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025
Same author

An epigenome-wide analysis of DNA methylation, racialized and economic inequities, and air pollution.

Clinical epigenetics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

Multiple imputation using auxiliary imputation variables that only predict missingness can increase bias due to data

Elinor Curnow1,2, Rosie P Cornish3,4, Jon E Heron3,4

  • 1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. elinor.curnow@bristol.ac.uk.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|October 7, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Including irrelevant auxiliary variables in multiple imputation (MI) can worsen bias when data are missing not at random (MNAR). Researchers should select auxiliary variables carefully based on their predictive power for the missing data, not just include all available ones.

Keywords:
ALSPACAuxiliary variableBias amplificationMissing dataMultiple imputation

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Epidemiological and clinical studies frequently encounter missing data, often handled using multiple imputation (MI).
  • Multiple imputation estimates can be biased if data are missing not at random (MNAR).
  • Auxiliary variables can mitigate bias in MI for MNAR data, but selection strategies require careful consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the impact of including auxiliary variables predictive of missingness but unrelated to the partially observed variable in MI models.
  • To quantify the additional bias introduced by such auxiliary variables in linear or logistic regression models.
  • To assess the effect on exposure coefficients when the partially observed variable is the outcome or exposure.

Main Methods:

  • Algebraic quantification and simulation studies were used to assess bias.
  • The study compared MI models with and without the inclusion of a specific type of auxiliary variable.
  • Analysis involved both continuous and binary partially observed variables, applied to outcomes and exposures.
  • Re-analysis of data from a birth cohort study illustrated the findings.

Main Results:

  • Including an auxiliary variable predictive of missingness but unrelated to the partially observed variable can introduce substantial additional bias.
  • This additional bias is particularly pronounced when the outcome is partially observed and missingness is driven by the outcome itself.
  • Bias is even greater when both the outcome and exposure contribute to the missingness mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • The common practice of including all available auxiliary variables in MI should be avoided when data may be MNAR.
  • Auxiliary variables should be selected based on their strong predictive association with the partially observed variable.
  • Identification of appropriate auxiliary variables requires careful consideration of causal diagrams, missingness mechanisms, and data exploration, accounting for potential selection bias.