Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: data mining and disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event

Jun Shen1, Pingli Luo1, Jianmei Xu2

  • 1Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Abstract

Insights

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors show new safety signals, including nail and psychiatric disorders. Analysis of FDA FAERS data revealed distinct safety profiles among CDK4/6 inhibitors, necessitating closer clinical monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Drug Safety

Background:

  • Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are key cell cycle regulators.
  • CDK4/6 inhibitors are vital targeted therapies for cancers with abnormal CDK regulation, like breast cancer.
  • These therapies aim to restore cell cycle control and inhibit tumor growth.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
  • To identify novel safety signals using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
  • To compare the safety profiles of different CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Main Methods:

  • Disproportionality analysis of AE reports in the FAERS database from 2015Q1 to 2023Q1.
  • Inclusion of palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib, trilaciclib, and dalpiciclib.
  • Systematic search using Standardized MedDRA Queries at the preferred term (PT) level, followed by disproportionality and sensitivity analyses.

Main Results:

  • Analysis of 85,635 reports (280,211 AEs) identified 484 statistically significant safety signals.
  • Palbociclib and ribociclib demonstrated similar safety profiles, while abemaciclib showed distinct patterns.
  • Novel safety signals included nail disorders (e.g., onychoclasis, nail discoloration) and psychiatric concerns (e.g., eating, emotional disorders).

Conclusions:

  • The study identified new safety signals for CDK4/6 inhibitors, including nail and psychiatric AEs.
  • Differences in safety profiles exist among various CDK4/6 inhibitors.
  • These findings highlight the need for enhanced clinical monitoring of CDK4/6 inhibitor-associated adverse events.