Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I01:15

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I

184
Consider an electrical power grid, where stability is essential to prevent blackouts. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is a valuable tool for assessing system stability under varying load conditions or faults. By analyzing the closed-loop transfer function, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion helps determine whether the system remains stable.
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
184
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

199
In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
199
Vector Algebra: Method of Components01:08

Vector Algebra: Method of Components

13.8K
It is cumbersome to find the magnitudes of vectors using the parallelogram rule or using the graphical method to perform mathematical operations like addition, subtraction, and multiplication. There are two ways to circumvent this algebraic complexity. One way is to draw the vectors to scale, as in navigation, and read approximate vector lengths and angles (directions) from the graphs. The other way is to use the method of components.
In many applications, the magnitudes and directions of...
13.8K
Vector Algebra: Graphical Method01:10

Vector Algebra: Graphical Method

12.0K
Vectors can be multiplied by scalars, added to other vectors, or subtracted from other vectors. The vector sum of two (or more) vectors is called the resultant vector or, for short, the resultant.
We use the laws of geometry to construct resultant vectors, followed by trigonometry to find vector magnitudes and directions. For a geometric construction of the sum of two vectors in a plane, we follow the parallelogram rule. Suppose two vectors are at arbitrary positions. Translate either one of...
12.0K
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction01:05

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction

4.9K
It is far more common for collisions to occur in two dimensions; that is, the initial velocity vectors are neither parallel nor antiparallel to each other. Let's see what complications arise from this. The first idea is that momentum is a vector. Like all vectors, it can be expressed as a sum of perpendicular components (usually, though not always, an x-component and a y-component, and a z-component if necessary). Thus, when the statement of conservation of momentum is written for a...
4.9K
Divergence and Stokes' Theorems01:06

Divergence and Stokes' Theorems

1.5K
The divergence and Stokes' theorems are a variation of Green's theorem in a higher dimension. They are also a generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus. The divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem are in a way similar to each other; The divergence theorem relates to the dot product of a vector, while Stokes' theorem relates to the curl of a vector. Many applications in physics and engineering make use of the divergence and Stokes' theorems, enabling us to write...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factorization norms and an inverse theorem for MaxCut.

Mathematische annalen·2026
Same author

Matrix discrepancy and the log-rank conjecture.

Mathematical programming·2025
Same author

The growth rate of multicolor Ramsey numbers of 3-graphs.

Research in the mathematical sciences·2024
Same author

The <i>n</i>-queens completion problem.

Research in the mathematical sciences·2022
Same author

A Sharp Threshold Phenomenon in String Graphs.

Discrete & computational geometry·2022
Same journal

Some Fast Algorithms for Curves in Surfaces.

Discrete & computational geometry·2026
Same journal

A Full Halin Grid Theorem.

Discrete & computational geometry·2026
Same journal

Stability and Inference of the Euler Characteristic Transform.

Discrete & computational geometry·2026
Same journal

Error Resilient Space Partitioning.

Discrete & computational geometry·2026
Same journal

A Faithful Discretization of Verbose Directional Transforms.

Discrete & computational geometry·2026
Same journal

Maximum Betti Numbers of Čech Complexes.

Discrete & computational geometry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K

Evasive Sets, Covering by Subspaces, and Point-Hyperplane Incidences.

Benny Sudakov1, István Tomon2

  • 1ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Discrete & Computational Geometry
|October 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers explored (k, c)-subspace evasive sets in finite fields, proving new bounds and offering alternative proofs. This work impacts combinatorial geometry and hyperplane incidence problems.

Keywords:
CodesCovering problemsEvasive sets

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.2K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K
Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.2K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Combinatorics
  • Finite Fields
  • Algebraic Geometry

Background:

  • Introduces (k, c)-subspace evasive sets, where k-dimensional affine subspaces intersect the set S in at most c elements.
  • Highlights existing bounds on the maximum size of such sets, particularly when c is large, referencing Dvir and Lovett's work.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an alternative proof for the lower bound of (k, c)-subspace evasive sets using the random algebraic method.
  • To establish sharp upper bounds for (k, c)-evasive sets when the field size d is large, extending prior research.
  • To explore consequences in combinatorial geometry, specifically related to covering grids with hyperplanes and point-hyperplane incidences.

Main Methods:

  • Employs the random algebraic method for proving bounds on subspace evasive sets.
  • Utilizes techniques from combinatorial geometry to analyze grid coverings and point-hyperplane incidences.
  • Leverages averaging arguments and algebraic methods to derive upper and lower bounds.

Main Results:

  • Presents an alternative proof for the lower bound on the size of (k, c)-subspace evasive sets.
  • Establishes new sharp upper bounds for (k, c)-evasive sets in large fields.
  • Determines the minimum number of k-dimensional hyperplanes to cover a grid, matching existing upper bounds.
  • Improves the lower bound for point-hyperplane incidences under specific graph avoidance conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers new insights into the structure and bounds of subspace evasive sets.
  • The findings have direct implications for problems in combinatorial geometry, including grid covering and point-hyperplane incidences.
  • The use of the random algebraic method provides a powerful alternative for tackling these types of problems.