Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.2K
Doing things efficiently: Testing an account of why simple explanations are satisfying
Claudia G Sehl1, Stephanie Denison1, Ori Friedman1
1Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Cognitive Psychology
|October 8, 2024
Summary
People prefer simple explanations and efficient goal completion. This preference for simplicity in cognitive tasks diminishes or reverses when statistical information about causal elements is provided, suggesting shared cognitive mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Psychology
- Decision-Making
Background:
- Humans often favor simpler explanations over complex ones.
- This preference may extend beyond explanations to goal-directed processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the preference for simplicity applies to goal achievement processes.
- To determine how statistical information influences preferences for simple versus complex methods.
Main Methods:
- Seven preregistered experiments with 2820 participants.
- Participants evaluated simple and complex methods for producing outcomes, as explanations or processes.
- Statistical information about causal elements was manipulated.
Main Results:
- Participants consistently preferred simple methods for explanations and processes when no statistical information was present.
- Preferences for simplicity decreased and often reversed when statistical information was provided.
- Similar patterns were observed for both explanation and process judgments.
Conclusions:
- The preference for simplicity in explanations is linked to a broader tendency for efficient goal completion.
- Cognitive mechanisms underlying judgments of explanations and goal-directed processes are likely shared.
- Statistical information plays a crucial role in modulating these simplicity preferences.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K
Types of Hypothesis Testing
26.2K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.2K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K

