Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Isolation of Human Islets from Partially Pancreatectomized Patients
Published on: July 30, 2011
Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery Reduces Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Over 3.7 Million Adults, Independent
Angeliki M Angelidi1,2, Eirini G Martinou3, Dimitrios G Karamanis4,5
1Metabolism Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Aims:
To investigate the impact of Metabolic-Bariatric surgery (MBS) on pancreatic cancer (PCa) risk in individuals with obesity based on type 2 diabetes(T2D) status.
Materials And Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022367749). The primary outcomes were the PCa incidence rates in participants with or without T2D who underwent MBS compared with the control (non-MBS) group. Subgroup analyses based on the MBS types were performed and a random-effects model was employed. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by applying the leave-one-out meta-analysis technique and excluding studies with a short follow-up. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 index and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's test and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool.
Results:
Twelve studies, with 3,711,243 participants, were included. PCa risk was lower in the MBS group for both T2D and the overall population than in the non-MBS group (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.71 and RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.57, respectively), with consistent findings after excluding studies with < 3-year follow-up. A favourable impact was also observed in individuals without T2D (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.78). When comparing the types of MBS versus control, a significant difference was observed for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (RR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.46 for SG and RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.09 for Roux-En-Y bypass). Egger's test showed no indication of publication bias (p = 0.417).
Conclusions:
MBS is associated with reduced PCa risk regardless of T2D, with a more pronounced effect in T2D patients. Additional research is needed to investigate the impact of MBS types on PCa.
Insights
Metabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS) significantly reduces pancreatic cancer (PCa) risk in individuals with obesity, especially those with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This finding holds true across various MBS procedures, warranting further investigation into specific surgical impacts.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Oncology
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are known risk factors for various cancers, including pancreatic cancer (PCa).
- Metabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for obesity and T2D, potentially influencing cancer risk.
- The specific impact of MBS on PCa risk, particularly in relation to T2D status, requires comprehensive evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the association between Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery (MBS) and pancreatic cancer (PCa) risk.
- To investigate whether T2D status modifies the effect of MBS on PCa risk.
- To compare the impact of different MBS types on PCa incidence.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Inclusion of twelve studies encompassing 3,711,243 participants.
- Primary outcome: PCa incidence rates in MBS versus non-MBS groups, with subgroup analyses for T2D status and MBS types.
Main Results:
- MBS was associated with a significantly lower PCa risk in both the overall population (RR=0.21) and T2D patients (RR=0.46) compared to non-MBS controls.
- A favorable impact was also observed in individuals without T2D (RR=0.56).
- Sleeve gastrectomy showed a significant reduction in PCa risk (RR=0.24) compared to Roux-en-Y bypass (RR=0.52).
Conclusions:
- Metabolic-bariatric surgery is linked to a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer, irrespective of type 2 diabetes status.
- The risk reduction appears more pronounced in patients with T2D.
- Further research is necessary to elucidate the differential effects of various MBS procedures on PCa risk.
Related Concept Videos
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

