Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing variations in 3D image quality in chest CT across sites and scanners.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Challenges to the management of oncologic theranostics clinical trials: recommendations for the conduct of theranostics trials at investigational sites.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2024
Same author

Digital wrist tomosynthesis (DWT)-based finite element analysis of ultra-distal radius differentiates patients with and without a history of osteoporotic fracture.

Bone·2023
Same author

Changing Landscape of Fentanyl/Heroin Use and Distribution.

Annals of clinical and laboratory science·2023
Same author

Variations in signal-to-noise characteristics of tissue-equivalent attenuators for mammographic automatic exposure control system performance evaluation.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

14.4K

A new method to evaluate fluoroscopic system collimator performance.

Joseph R Steiner1, Courtney K Morrison2, Mayur Vaya3

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|October 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new method quantifies fluoroscopy collimator performance using radiopaque rulers and film. This evaluation ensures compliance with regulations, with four systems found to exceed established radiation field limits.

Keywords:
equipment performance evaluation (EPE)fluoroscopyquality control

More Related Videos

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.0K
Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
10:46

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology

Published on: May 26, 2015

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

14.4K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.0K
Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
10:46

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology

Published on: May 26, 2015

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiological Sciences
  • Diagnostic Imaging Technology

Background:

  • Fluoroscopy utilizes collimators to restrict radiation field size, requiring annual performance evaluations for regulatory compliance.
  • Equipment performance evaluations are crucial for maintaining standards in medical imaging facilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a method for evaluating and quantifying fluoroscopy collimator performance.
  • To ensure fluoroscopic systems meet regulatory and accreditation requirements for radiation field limitation.

Main Methods:

  • A measurement device with radiopaque rulers and radiochromic film was employed at the X-ray source assembly exit window.
  • The method was applied to 79 diverse fluoroscopic systems, including fixed, mobile, and mini C-arms, as well as radiographic fluoroscopic units.

Main Results:

  • Measurements of excess length (EL) and excess width (EW) were compared against 21 CFR 1020.32 limits, with four systems exceeding these thresholds.
  • The radiation measurement device placement increased film exposure rates significantly (up to 14.6x).
  • The entire measurement process, including setup, took between 5 to 10 minutes per system.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method offers a straightforward, quantitative assessment of fluoroscopy collimator performance.
  • This approach effectively meets the requirements set by regulatory and accreditation bodies for radiation safety and equipment performance.