Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

The Hawaii Protocol for Scientific Monitoring of Coffee Berry Borer: a Model for Coffee Agroecosystems Worldwide
Published on: March 19, 2018
Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework
Flavio Affinito1,2,3, James M Williams4, Jillian E Campbell5
1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. flavio.affinito@mail.mcgill.ca.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework uses a Monitoring Framework to track progress on biodiversity targets. While most indicators are ready, data gaps and methodological issues require further investment and scientific support for effective implementation.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Environmental Science
- Conservation Biology
Background:
- Global biodiversity decline necessitates urgent action, leading to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF).
- The GBF emphasizes transparency and responsibility to achieve harmony with nature by 2050.
- A comprehensive Monitoring Framework is crucial for evidence-based actions and progress tracking under the GBF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the operationalization and readiness of indicators within the GBF Monitoring Framework.
- To identify challenges and limitations hindering the effective implementation of biodiversity monitoring.
- To highlight the need for resources and scientific support to enhance biodiversity measurement and conservation efforts.
Main Methods:
- Selection of indicators by Parties through a political process.
- Operationalization of selected indicators via a scientific process led by an expert group.
- Assessment of indicator methodologies and data availability for progress assessment.
Main Results:
- Most indicators are scientifically operationalized and ready to inform on progress.
- Significant limitations persist regarding data availability and methodological challenges.
- The Monitoring Framework offers an unprecedented national-level view of biodiversity status.
Conclusions:
- Investment is crucial to overcome data and methodological weaknesses in the Monitoring Framework.
- Enhanced scientific support is needed for indicator use, development, and implementation.
- Effective implementation of the Monitoring Framework is vital for assessing national and global biodiversity progress and mobilizing conservation actions.
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
What is Conservation Biology?
What is Biodiversity?
Threats to Biodiversity
Global Regulatory Systems

