Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Complication frequency of mechanical chest compression devices: A single-center, blinded study using retrospective
Takumi Tsuchida1, Takashi Kamiishi2, Hiroaki Usubuchi2
1Division of Acute and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Mechanical chest compression devices like LUCAS did not increase overall complications in cardiac arrest patients. However, LUCAS use was linked to more hemothorax cases and longer transport times compared to manual CPR.
Area of Science:
- Emergency medicine
- Cardiology
- Critical care medicine
Background:
- Mechanical chest compression devices are increasingly used for cardiac arrest.
- Existing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines and device updates necessitate evidence review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare complications associated with mechanical chest compression devices (LUCAS) versus manual CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Main Methods:
- A single-center, retrospective study of adult OHCA patients receiving CPR.
- Propensity score matching was used to compare patients receiving LUCAS versus manual CPR.
- Computed tomography (CT) scans evaluated by a blinded radiologist to determine compression complications.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in overall chest compression complications between LUCAS and manual CPR groups.
- The LUCAS group had a higher incidence of hemothorax (p=0.028).
- Factors like female sex, older age, and longer CPR duration correlated with complications, while LUCAS use did not.
Conclusions:
- LUCAS use was not associated with an increased overall incidence of chest compression complications in OHCA patients.
- LUCAS use was associated with more hemothorax and longer transport times compared to manual CPR.
- Further research is needed to evaluate the multifaceted benefits of LUCAS.
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Flail Chest-I
Flail chest is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the fracture of three or more adjacent ribs in multiple places. It is most commonly caused by direct impacts and trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or injuries from a steering wheel impact. It can also occur due to falls in elderly individuals with osteoporosis, or assaults involving sharp objects.
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of flail chest is complex, involving fractures of...
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings

