Efficacy, Safety and Mechanistic Impact of a Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic

Although clinical evidence supports rapid institution of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF), in actual practice, there remain large gaps in adherence to guideline recommendations. Recent data support safety and efficacy of rapid GDMT implementation; however, rapid GDMT deployment within a general cardiology environment remains unexplored.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a GDMT clinic within a general cardiology practice relative to usual care, the impact on prescription of GDMT, HF symptoms, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of remodeling.

Individuals with HF with an abnormal ejection fraction (<50%) referred to the GDMT clinic underwent rapid GDMT titration with close monitoring of clinical data. Rates of GDMT prescription were compared with a matched reference group. Patients underwent echocardiography at baseline and after GDMT clinic completion.

A total of 114 persons were treated in GDMT clinic. The mean age was 67.6 ± 14.6 years, and 32 (28%) were women. Among those referred, 100 (87.7%) had no contraindications for 4-drug GDMT. From baseline to clinic completion (median 15.8 weeks [Q1-Q3: 10.7-23.0 weeks]), patients without medication contraindications experienced significant increases in 4-drug GDMT use (from 21% to 88%; P < 0.001); of 4-drug GDMT recipients, 92% received angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. GDMT clinic participants achieved higher medication doses than those in usual care, with greater achievement of ≥50% target dose of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (52% vs 8%), beta-blocker (78% vs 6.2%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98% vs 15.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (92% vs 6.2%). Target doses of all 4 drugs were reached in nearly 1 in 4 participants. HF symptoms improved (94% to 75% NYHA functional class II/III; P < 0.001) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased (median 587 to 534 ng/L; P = 0.03) despite loop diuretic reduction. Additionally, we observed an absolute 6% LVEF increase (from 37% [Q1-Q3: 31%-41%] to 43% [Q1-Q3: 38%-53%]; P < 0.001) and substantial decrease in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. GDMT titration was well-tolerated.

Rapid GDMT implementation via an outpatient GDMT clinic was effective, safe, and associated with improvement in key clinical parameters. The more widespread role of GDMT clinics to improve HF care warrants further study.