Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
To reduce editor bias and increase diversity and transparency, editors must be motivated: Commentary on Sharpe (2024)
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Abstract:
Sharpe (2024) summarized the factors leading to editorial bias, lack of diversity, and lack of transparency and indicated what might improve matters. Here, I argue that the suggestions that were made would be improved if more thought were given to how these changes impact the incentives of editors. I give examples in the areas of control of bias, encouragement of diversity, and increase of transparency, showing what might be done to incentivize editors, along with other stakeholders, to work on these issues. Perhaps most notably, I suggest that we might change the publication model to allow more individuals to take part by retaining peer review but not organizing the reviews around journals that each have a single chief editor. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Biodiversity and Human Values
Types of Selection
Altruism
Feedback Inhibition
Proofreading

