Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Lateralization

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mental rotation, perspective taking, and performance profiling.

Cognitive processing·2025

Same author

Multisensory perception and decision-making with a new sensory skill.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023

Same author

An adaptive cue selection model of allocentric spatial reorientation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2021

Same author

Coding Locations Relative to One or Many Landmarks in Childhood.

PLoS computational biology·2019

Same author

Boundaries in spatial cognition: Looking like a boundary is more important than being a boundary.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

No evidence for a difference in Bayesian reasoning for egocentric versus allocentric spatial cognition.

¹Psychology Department, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

|October 10, 2024

Summary

This study investigated Bayesian reasoning in human spatial cognition. Contrary to predictions, egocentric and allocentric frames of reference did not yield different Bayesian effects in perception and cognition tasks.

More Related Videos

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Analysis of Human Interaction with 3D Virtual Objects

Published on: October 18, 2024

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human Perception

Background:

Bayesian reasoning models human perception and cognition.
A key challenge is predicting when Bayesian effects manifest in human performance.
A proposed theory suggests stronger Bayesian effects in egocentric (self-centered) spatial cognition than allocentric (world-centered).

Purpose of the Study:

To test the hypothesis that Bayesian reasoning is stronger in egocentric spatial tasks compared to allocentric spatial tasks.
To determine if the frame of reference (egocentric vs. allocentric) influences Bayesian effects in prior integration, cue combination, and loss minimization.

Main Methods:

Three experiments compared egocentric-allowing and allocentric-requiring conditions with matched tasks.
Experiment 1 assessed prior integration.
Experiment 2 examined cue combination.
Experiment 3 investigated loss minimization.

Main Results:

No significant difference in Bayesian reasoning effects was observed between egocentric and allocentric conditions across all three experiments.
Prior integration, cue combination, and loss minimization showed similar Bayesian effects regardless of the spatial frame.

Conclusions:

The proposed distinction between egocentric and allocentric spatial cognition regarding Bayesian reasoning was not supported.
Observed differences in previous studies may stem from task complexity and memory demands rather than the frame of reference itself.