Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Downregulation of circFASTKD1 ameliorates myocardial infarction by promoting angiogenesis.

Aging·2021

Same author

A Special Report on 2019 International Planning Competition and a Comprehensive Analysis of Its Results.

Frontiers in oncology·2020

Same author

Tomato protein phosphatase 2C influences the onset of fruit ripening and fruit glossiness.

Journal of experimental botany·2020

Same author

CT changes of severe coronavirus disease 2019 based on prognosis.

Scientific reports·2020

Same author

Meta-neural-network for real-time and passive deep-learning-based object recognition.

Nature communications·2020

Same author

Selective stress of antibiotics on microbial denitrification: Inhibitory effects, dynamics of microbial community structure and function.

Journal of hazardous materials·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

A deep learning-based dose calculation method for volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Bin Liang¹, Wenlong Xia¹, Ran Wei¹

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuannanli Rd., Chaoyang Dist, Beijing, 100021, China.

Radiation Oncology (London, England)

|October 10, 2024

Summary

This study introduces a deep learning method for faster Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) dose calculation. The AI model significantly reduces computation time while maintaining accurate dose distributions for VMAT planning.

Keywords:

Deep learning Dose calculation Planning optimization VMAT

More Related Videos

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

Area of Science:

Medical Physics
Radiotherapy
Artificial Intelligence

Background:

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning requires frequent dose recalculations due to numerous iterative parameters.
Current dose calculation methods in VMAT are computationally intensive, hindering optimization efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a fast and accurate dose calculation method for VMAT using deep learning.
To accelerate the VMAT planning optimization process by reducing dose calculation time.

Main Methods:

A 3D UNet deep learning model was trained using projected fluence maps, CT images, radiological depth, and source-to-voxel distance.
The model learned dose calculation physics, with treatment planning system (TPS) calculated doses serving as ground truth.
51 head and neck VMAT plans were utilized for training, validation, and testing.

Main Results:

The deep learning method achieved dose distributions comparable to TPS calculations, with an average gamma pass rate above 96% across various criteria.
Network-derived doses were smoother than TPS doses but showed no significant differences in critical dose indices.
Computational time was reduced by approximately one-sixth, from 95.60s (TPS) to 16.51s (network) per patient.

Conclusions:

The deep learning-based dose calculation method demonstrates good agreement with TPS calculations.
The significant reduction in computational time highlights its potential for VMAT planning optimization.
This AI approach offers a promising solution for improving the efficiency of radiotherapy planning.