Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Leads to a Larger Intraabdominal Volume During Laparoscopy
Published on: June 25, 2013
Feasibility of opioid-free anesthesia in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A retrospective, quasi-experimental
Ana Tejedor1, Lana Bijelic2, Marta García1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain.
Background And Aims:
Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) provides adequate analgesia minimizing opioids. OFA has not been evaluated in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our aim was to evaluate OFA feasibility and its effectiveness in LRP.
Material And Methods:
A quasi-experimental retrospective study of 55 adult patients undergoing LRP was performed from September 2020 until December 20223. Predefined protocols for either opioid-based anesthesia (OBA; with continuous remifentanil infusion) or OFA (continuous lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine infusion) were followed. In both groups, wound infiltration was performed before skin incision. Primary outcome was postoperative pain management (numerical rating scale [NRS]) in the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, start to sitting and ambulation, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.
Results:
OFA protocol patients had better median pain scores during movement at 1, 18 and 24 h, that is, 1 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-3) versus 2.5 (IQR 0-4), P = 0.047; 0 (IQR 0-1) versus 1 (IQR 0-2), P = 0.017; and 0 (IQR 0-0.25) versus 1 (IQR 0-2), P = 0.013, respectively. At 6 and 12 h, there were no statistically significant differences, that is, 0.5 (IQR 0-2) versus 1 (IQR 0-2), P = 0.908 and 1 (IQR 0-2) versus 0.5 (IQR 0-2), P = 0.929, respectively. Lower morphine requirements were recorded in the first 18 and 24 postoperative hours, that is, 0 (IQR 0-0) versus 1 (IQR 0-2.75) mg, P = 0.028 and 0 (IQR 0-2) versus 1.5 (IQR 0-3) mg, P = 0.012, respectively. Start to sitting and ambulation occurred earlier in the OFA group (P = 0.030 and P = 0.002, respectively). Linear regression showed that ambulation was independently associated with the analgesic technique (P = 0.034). Only one patient had postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and belonged to the OBA group. There was no difference in total complications or the length of stay.
Conclusion:
In this study, OFA strategy was found to be safe, feasible, and provided adequate analgesia, minimizing the use of postoperative opioids, and was independently associated with earlier ambulation.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Analgesia and Pain Management
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia