Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
A complex ePrescribing antimicrobial stewardship-based (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals: mixed-methods feasibility
Christopher J Weir1, Susan Hinder2, Imad Adamestam3
1Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Christopher.Weir@ed.ac.uk.
Background:
Antibiotic resistant infections cause over 700,000 deaths worldwide annually. As antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) helps minimise the emergence of antibiotic resistance resulting from inappropriate use of antibiotics in healthcare, we developed ePAMS+ (ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship), an ePrescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) system decision-support tool complemented by educational, behavioural and organisational elements.
Methods:
We conducted a non-randomised before-and-after feasibility trial, implementing ePAMS+ in two English hospitals using the Cerner Millennium EPMA system. Wards of several specialties were included. Patient participants were blinded to whether ePAMS+ was in use; prescribers were not. A mixed-methods evaluation aimed to establish: acceptability and usability of ePAMS+ and trial processes; feasibility of ePAMS+ implementation and quantitative outcome recording; and a Fidelity Index measuring the extent to which ePAMS+ was delivered as intended. Longitudinal semi-structured interviews of doctors, nurses and pharmacists, alongside non-participant observations, gathered qualitative data; we extracted quantitative prescribing data from the EPMA system. Normal linear modelling of the defined daily dose (DDD) of antibiotic per admission quantified its variability, to inform sample size calculations for a future trial of ePAMS+ effectiveness.
Results:
The research took place during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, from April 2021 to November 2022. 60 qualitative interviews were conducted (33 before ePAMS+ implementation, 27 after). 1,958 admissions (1,358 before ePAMS+ implementation; 600 after) included 24,884 antibiotic orders. Qualitative interviews confirmed that some aspects of ePAMS+ , its implementation and training were acceptable, while other features (e.g. enabling combinations of antibiotics to be prescribed) required further development. ePAMS+ uptake was low (28 antibiotic review records from 600 admissions; 0.047 records per admission), preventing full development of a Fidelity Index. Normal linear modelling of antibiotic DDD per admission showed a residual variance of 1.086 (log-transformed scale). Unavailability of indication data prevented measurement of some outcomes (e.g. number of antibiotic courses per indication).
Conclusions:
This feasibility trial encountered unforeseen circumstances due to contextual factors and a global pandemic, highlighting the need for careful adaptation of complex intervention implementations to the local setting. We identified key refinements to ePAMS+ to support its wider adoption in clinical practice, requiring further piloting before a confirmatory effectiveness trial.
Trial Registration:
ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN13429325, 24 March 2022.
Insights
A new ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) tool showed mixed results in a feasibility trial. Further refinements are needed to improve adoption and effectiveness in combating antibiotic resistance.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Antibiotic-resistant infections are a major global health threat, causing over 700,000 deaths annually.
- Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are crucial for minimizing antibiotic resistance.
- The ePAMS+ (ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship) tool was developed to support AMS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ePAMS+ system.
- To assess the implementation processes and quantitative outcome recording for ePAMS+.
- To inform sample size calculations for a future trial on ePAMS+ effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- A non-randomised before-and-after feasibility trial was conducted in two English hospitals.
- A mixed-methods evaluation included qualitative interviews and quantitative prescribing data analysis.
- The study utilized the Cerner Millennium ePrescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) system.
Main Results:
- The trial occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, impacting implementation.
- Qualitative feedback indicated some aspects of ePAMS+ were acceptable, but required further development.
- Uptake of ePAMS+ was low, hindering full evaluation and preventing measurement of certain outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The feasibility trial highlighted challenges in implementing complex interventions during unforeseen circumstances like a pandemic.
- Key refinements for ePAMS+ were identified to enhance clinical practice adoption.
- Further piloting is necessary before a confirmatory effectiveness trial can be conducted.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...

