Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Patent Foramen Ovale and Other Cardiopathies as Causes of Embolic Stroke With Unknown Source
1Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan, Gangneung, Korea.
Insights
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure effectively reduces recurrent strokes in embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) patients with high-risk PFOs. Medical therapy remains unclear for ESUS without PFO, necessitating further research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology and Neurology
- Cerebrovascular Diseases
- Thrombosis and Embolism
Background:
- Embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) is often linked to cardiac conditions like atrial fibrillation and patent foramen ovale (PFO).
- PFOs are common in the general population, making causality in ESUS patients challenging to establish.
- Current medical therapies (anticoagulants, antiplatelets) for PFO-related ESUS lack clear superiority.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current understanding of ESUS causes, particularly PFO-related embolism.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of PFO closure versus medical therapy for stroke prevention in ESUS.
- To discuss management strategies for ESUS patients with and without PFO.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent randomized clinical trials and scientific literature.
- Analysis of treatment outcomes for percutaneous PFO closure versus medical management.
- Evaluation of risk factors associated with PFO and other potential embolic sources in ESUS.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous PFO closure significantly reduces recurrent strokes compared to medical therapy in ESUS patients with high-risk PFOs.
- PFO closure benefits are particularly notable in younger patients (<60 years) and those with large shunts or atrial septal aneurysms.
- For ESUS patients without PFO, current evidence does not show non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to be superior to antiplatelets.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous PFO closure is an effective strategy for preventing recurrent strokes in select ESUS patients.
- Therapeutic decisions for ESUS require multidisciplinary discussion, especially when PFO is absent or low-risk.
- Further research is essential to clarify the definition of emboligenic cardiopathy and optimize ESUS management.
Abstract:
In patients with stroke caused by cardiac embolism, the responsible heart diseases include atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, sick sinus syndrome, valvular disease, and significant heart failure. When there is no clear source of the embolism, the condition is referred to as "embolic stroke with unknown source (ESUS)." Recent studies have shown that the most common cause of ESUS is a right-to-left cardiac shunt through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, considering that PFOs are found in up to 25% of the general population, their presence does not necessarily indicate causality. In patients with ESUS associated with a PFO, either anticoagulants or antiplatelets are used for the prevention of future strokes or transient ischemic attacks. However, it currently remains unclear which treatment is superior. Nevertheless, recent randomized clinical trials have shown that percutaneous closure of the PFO more effectively reduces the incidence of recurrent strokes compared to medical therapy alone in patients with PFO-related strokes. This benefit is especially significant when the PFO carries high-risk features, such as a large shunt or the presence of an atrial septal aneurysm. Furthermore, the effectiveness of PFO closure has been well documented in young patients (<60 years) with a high-risk PFO development. In other cases, the therapeutic decision should be made through discussion among neurologists, cardiologists, and patients. Notably, in ESUS patients without a PFO, the underlying heart condition itself may be the source of embolism, with left atrial enlargement being the most important factor. Theoretically, anticoagulants such as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) would be an effective therapy in these cases. However, recent trials have failed to show that NOACs are superior to antiplatelets in preventing further strokes in these patients. This may be due to the still uncertain definition of emboligenic cardiopathy and the presence of other potential embolic sources, such as mild but emboligenic arterial diseases. Overall, further research is needed to elucidate the source of embolism and to determine an effective management strategy for patients with ESUS.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.

