Software tools for systematic review literature screening and data extraction: Qualitative user experiences from...

Area of Science:

• Preclinical research
• Systematic reviews
• Research methodology

Background:

• Systematic reviews (SRs) are vital for implementing the 3Rs in preclinical research.
• Increasing scientific literature necessitates efficient SR tools to manage time investment.
• Software for multiple SR phases, including data extraction, is less common than screening tools.

Purpose of the Study:

• To formally test four free or affordable multiphase systematic review tools: Covidence, Eppi, SRDR+, and SYRF.
• To evaluate the efficiency and user experience of these tools across different SR phases.
• To identify factors influencing the optimal choice of a systematic review tool.

Main Methods:

• Conducted formal tests on Covidence, Eppi, SRDR+, and SYRF.
• Performed full-text screening, sham data extraction (free text, numerical, categorical), and discrepancy resolution.
• Qualitatively summarized reviewer experiences and user feedback.

Main Results:

• All tested tools demonstrated value in the systematic review process.
• The optimal tool choice depends on factors like user experience, review type, specific questions, and team engagement.
• No single tool was universally superior, highlighting the need for tailored selection.

Conclusions:

• Multiphase review platforms offer significant advantages, including automated reference transfer and simultaneous work on multiple stages.
• The selection of an optimal systematic review tool requires careful consideration of specific project needs and team dynamics.
• Further research into user experiences can guide the development and selection of more effective systematic review software.