Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
Published on: September 8, 2012
Taxonomic Distribution, Phylogenetic Relationship, and Domain Conservation of CRISPR-Associated Cas Proteins
Weerakkody Ranasinghe1, Dorcie Gillette2, Alexis Ho1
1Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.
Abstract:
CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a naturally occurring genetic defense system in bacteria and archaea. It is comprised of a series of DNA sequence repeats with spacers derived from previous exposures to plasmid or phage. Further understanding and applications of CRISPR system have revolutionized our capacity for gene or genome editing of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The CRISPR systems are classified into 3 distinct types: type I, type II, and type III, each of which possesses an associated signature protein, Cas3, Cas9, and Cas10, respectively. As the CRISPR loci originated from earlier independent exposures of foreign genetic elements, it is likely that their associated signature proteins may have evolved rapidly. Also, their functional domain structures might have experienced different selective pressures, and therefore, they have differentially diverged in their amino acid sequences. We employed genomic, phylogenetic, and structure-function constraint analyses to reveal the evolutionary distribution, phylogenetic relationship, and structure-function constraints of Cas3, Cas9, and Cas10 proteins. Results reveal that all 3 Cas-associated proteins are highly represented in the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, including both pathogenic and non-pathogenic species. Genomic analysis of homologous proteins demonstrates that the proteins share 30% to 50% amino acid identity; therefore, they are low to moderately conserved and evolved rapidly. Phylogenetic analysis shows that 3 proteins originated monophyletically; however, the evolution rates were different among different branches of the clades. Furthermore, structure-function constraint analysis reveals that both Cas3 and Cas9 proteins experiences low to moderate levels of negative selection, and several protein domains of Cas3 and Cas9 proteins are highly conserved. To the contrary, most protein domains of Cas10 proteins experience neutral or positive selection, which supports rapid genetic divergence and less structure-function constraints.
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR and crRNAs
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
CRISPR
Caspases
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Homologous Recombination

