Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and
Gautham Varun Krishna Mohan1, Nawabzada Nadir Babar2, Sindhuja Sompalli3
1Internal Medicine, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, IND.
Abstract:
This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major electronic databases, identifying relevant studies published up to August 15, 2024. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, comparing IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis, while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates. Pooled analysis revealed that IVUS-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and stent thrombosis (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90) compared to angiography-guided PCI. Secondary outcomes also favored IVUS guidance, with significant reductions in cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). While a trend towards reduced all-cause mortality was observed with IVUS guidance, it did not reach statistical significance. Notably, low heterogeneity across studies strengthened the reliability of these findings. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the presence of myocardial infarction did not significantly moderate the effect of IVUS on clinical outcomes, suggesting consistent benefits across patient subgroups. These results highlight the potential of IVUS-guided PCI to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce the need for repeat procedures. The findings support the growing body of evidence favoring IVUS use in PCI, particularly in complex lesions and high-risk patients. However, considerations such as cost-effectiveness and the need for specialized training remain important factors in the widespread adoption of IVUS-guided PCI in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
08:12Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic studies