Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

07:13
Application of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in a Rat Model of NAFLD/NASH
Published on: April 20, 2021
3.9K
Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Between Two Different Instruments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Jiayao Huang1, Xiaoer Zhang1, Liya Su1
1Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Summary
Two devices for 2D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) show differing liver fibrosis assessments, particularly in advanced stages (F4). Alanine aminotransferase levels may explain these discrepancies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Hepatology
- Diagnostic Technologies
Background:
- Liver fibrosis assessment is crucial for managing liver diseases.
- 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is a non-invasive method for evaluating liver stiffness.
- Variability in 2D-SWE measurements between different devices can impact clinical interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 2D-SWE measurements from two distinct devices (AixPlorer V and APLIO i900).
- To identify factors influencing these measurements and their ability to assess liver fibrosis stages.
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 2D-SWE in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and healthy volunteers.
Main Methods:
- Prospective inclusion of 290 HCC patients and 30 healthy volunteers (October 2022 - September 2023).
- 2D-SWE measurements performed using AixPlorer V (SEmean) and APLIO i900 (CEmean).
- Statistical analysis including comparison between instruments and multivariate regression to identify influencing factors.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in 2D-SWE measurements were observed between the two devices (P < .001).
- Discrepancies were significant only in patients with F4 liver fibrosis (P < .001), not in F0-F3 stages or healthy volunteers.
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and fibrosis stage influenced SEmean; fibrosis stage influenced CEmean.
Conclusions:
- 2D-SWE can detect liver fibrosis, but results vary between devices, especially in advanced fibrosis (F4).
- Discrepancies were not observed in healthy individuals or those with early to moderate fibrosis (F0-F3).
- ALT levels may contribute to the observed inter-device measurement differences.

