Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Pressure-volume orbital measurement comparing decompression approaches.

C D McCord1, J R Putnam, D N Ugland

  • 1Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|January 1, 1985
PubMed
Summary

Four orbital decompression methods were compared. Four-wall decompression offered the greatest orbital volume change, while lateral wall decompression yielded the least, indicating varying effectiveness for orbital decompression surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Evolution of technique of the direct transblepharoplasty approach for the correction of lower lid and midfacial aging: maximizing results and minimizing complications in a 5-year experience.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000
Same author

The correction of lower lid malposition following lower lid blepharoplasty.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
Same author

Redraping the inferior orbicularis arc.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1998
Same author

Nucleolar size polymorphisms in commercial layer chickens; determination of incidence, inheritance, and nucleolar sizes.

Poultry science·1994
Same author

The correction of lower lid malposition following lower lid blepharoplasty.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1993
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Plastic Surgery

Background:

  • Orbital decompression is crucial for managing conditions like thyroid eye disease.
  • Several surgical techniques exist, including lateral wall, antral-ethmoidal, three-wall, and four-wall decompressions.
  • Understanding the volumetric changes associated with each method is essential for optimizing surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of four common orbital decompression techniques.
  • To quantify the volume changes within the bony orbit following each decompression method.

Main Methods:

  • Four distinct orbital decompression techniques were simulated: lateral wall, antral-ethmoidal, three-wall, and four-wall.
  • Saline-filled bladders were used to measure orbital compliance before and after decompression in intact bony orbits.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Volume changes were analyzed to compare the efficacy of each method.

    • Main Results:

    • Lateral wall decompressions resulted in the smallest volume change.
    • Four-wall decompressions demonstrated the most significant volume change.
    • Three-wall decompressions offered the second-best pressure reduction, indicating substantial volumetric change.

    Conclusions:

    • The extent of orbital decompression varies significantly among the four common surgical techniques.
    • Four-wall decompression appears most effective in achieving maximal orbital volume reduction.
    • The choice of decompression technique should be tailored to the specific clinical needs for effective orbital decompression.