Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Calcification of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Imaging of Aortic Calcification and Inflammation
Published on: May 31, 2016
Impact of provision of abdominal aortic calcification results on fruit and vegetable intake: 12-week randomized phase
Simone Radavelli-Bagatini1, Catherine P Bondonno2,3, Jack Dalla Via2
1Nutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia. s.radavellibagatini@ecu.edu.au.
Abstract:
Provision of non-invasive vascular imaging results to individuals has been shown to improve cardiovascular disease risk factor control: its impact on diet remains uncertain. In this two-arm, single-blind, parallel, 12-week randomized controlled trial, 240 participants, 57.5% females aged 60-80 y had abdominal aortic calcification and clinical assessments performed at a hospital clinic. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive (intervention n = 121) or not (control n = 119) their calcification results. Both groups received educational resources on cardiovascular disease risk control and were unblinded to the intervention. Outcome measures were performed at baseline and 12 weeks. The primary outcomes of the study were changes in fruit and vegetable intake measures over 12 weeks assessed using plasma carotenoid concentrations (biomarkers of FV intake) and a food frequency questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included 12-week changes in other aspects of the diet, physical activity, body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, lipid profile, glucose concentrations, estimated cardiovascular disease risk score, and medication use. Between-group differences were tested using linear mixed-effects regression. There were no between-group differences in the primary outcomes at 12 weeks: plasma carotenoids (mean difference +0.03 µg/mL [95%CI -0.06, 0.13]) and fruit and vegetable intakes (+18 g/d [-37, 72]). However, the provision of calcification results led to between-group differences in serum total (-0.22 mmol/L [-0.41, -0.04]) and non-HDL (-0.19 mmol/L [-0.35, -0.03]) cholesterol, and estimated cardiovascular disease risk score (-0.24% [-0.47, -0.02]). No between-group differences were seen for other secondary outcomes. In this work, providing vascular imaging results did not improve diet but did improve some cardiovascular disease risk factors (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001087246).
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Urinary Tract Calculi IV: Nutrition therapy and prevention
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical manifestations and prevention
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Medical Management

