Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025
09:17
3D Printing of Biomolecular Models for Research and Pedagogy
Published on: March 13, 2017
23.7K
A Practical Guide to 3D Printing for Chemistry and Biology Laboratories.
Arjun S Pamidi1, Michael B Spano1, Gregory A Weiss1,2,3
1Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California.
Current Protocols
|October 15, 2024
Summary
This overview highlights the transformative potential of 3D printing in chemistry and biology labs, advocating for widespread adoption and training. It provides practical guidance on creating functional 3D-printed parts and emphasizes reproducible reporting for scientific innovation.
Area of Science:
- Scientific instrumentation and laboratory techniques
- Materials science and engineering
- Biotechnology and chemical sciences
Background:
- Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers significant advantages for laboratory work, including rapid prototyping and increased accessibility of scientific tools.
- Widespread adoption of 3D printing technology in chemistry and biology laboratories is encouraged, necessitating trained personnel.
- Existing scientific workflows can be transformed through the integration of 3D printing capabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of 3D printing techniques, challenges, and best practices for laboratory applications.
- To guide scientists in designing, printing, and implementing functional 3D-printed parts, including watertight components like flow cells.
- To establish principles for reporting 3D-printed innovations to enhance reproducibility and foster collaborative scientific advancement.
Main Methods:
- Surveying techniques, intricacies, and potential pitfalls in 3D printing functional laboratory parts.
- Detailing the process from computer-aided design (CAD) and slicing to printer operation and maintenance.
- Discussing specific methods for creating watertight 3D-printed components, such as flow cells.
- Outlining principles for documenting and reporting 3D printing innovations for reproducibility.
Main Results:
- Identification of key considerations for successful 3D printing in a laboratory setting, including material selection and troubleshooting.
- Demonstration of techniques for producing functional and watertight 3D-printed parts essential for various experiments.
- Establishment of a framework for reporting 3D-printed designs to ensure clarity, reproducibility, and iterative improvement.
Conclusions:
- 3D printing holds immense potential to revolutionize scientific discovery by enabling custom apparatus and innovative workflows.
- Adoption of standardized reporting principles for 3D-printed innovations is crucial for accelerating progress in chemistry and biology.
- Training scientists in 3D printing technologies will empower them to create bespoke tools, enhancing research capabilities and reproducibility.
