Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
Published on: August 10, 2014
Fast & furious: Rejecting the hypothesis that secondary psychopathy improves reaction time-based concealed
Imbar Mizrahi1, Nathalie Klein Selle1,2
1Department of Criminology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
This study investigated if secondary psychopathy affects the Reaction-Time based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT). Findings indicate that psychopathic traits do not compromise the test's validity, suggesting its robustness in deception detection.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Forensic Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Deception detection is challenging; memory detection via Reaction-Time based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) offers an alternative.
- RT-CIT relies on response conflict and inhibition, potentially impacted by traits like psychopathy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between secondary psychopathy and the RT-CIT effect.
- To determine if psychopathic traits influence the accuracy and validity of the RT-CIT.
Main Methods:
- A novel RT-CIT paradigm with no-go trials was used to assess response inhibition.
- Participants (n=86, student sample) completed the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11).
Main Results:
- The RT-CIT paradigm demonstrated high detection efficiency.
- No significant correlation was found between the RT-CIT effect and secondary psychopathic traits (BF01 = 6.98).
Conclusions:
- Secondary psychopathic traits neither enhance nor impair the validity of the RT-CIT.
- The findings support the robustness of the RT-CIT paradigm for concealed information detection across different individual differences.
More Related Videos
09:12Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
Published on: March 17, 2019
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023