Efficacy and Safety of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgery in the Management of Colorectal...

The use of fluorescence agents and imaging systems is a promising adjunct in the surgical management of colorectal cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluorescence-guided surgery in the management of colorectal cancer, with a comparison to conventional (non-fluorescence-guided) surgery.

A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and CINAHL databases was performed for studies that reported data on the outcomes of fluorescence-guided surgery, with or without a comparison group undergoing conventional surgery, for colorectal cancer between January 2000 and January 2024. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed.

35 studies of 3217 patients with colorectal cancer were included: 26 studies (964 patients) reported on fluorescence-guided surgery and 9 studies (2253 patients) reported on fluorescence versus conventional surgery. The weighted mean of the cancer detection rate of fluorescence-guided surgery was 71% (95% CI 0.55-0.85), with no significant difference in lymph node yield ratio (WMD -0.04; 95% CI -0.10-0.02; p = 0.201) between fluorescence and conventional surgery groups. There was a significantly lower blood loss (WMD -4.38; 95% CI -7.05--1.70; p = 0.001) and complication rate (WMD -0.04; 95% CI -0.07-0.00; p = 0.027) in the fluorescence-guided surgery group, with a potentially lower anastomotic leak rate (WMD -0.05; 95% CI -0.10-0.01; p = 0.092).

Fluorescence-guided surgery is a safe and effective approach in the management of colorectal cancer, potentially reducing blood loss and complications. Further randomised controlled trials are required comparing fluorescence-guided surgery with conventional surgery to determine its prognostic benefit and where it should precisely fit within the management pathway of colorectal cancer.