Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Are pragmatism and ethical protections in clinical trials a zero-sum game?
Hayden P Nix1, Charles Weijer2,3,4, Monica Taljaard5,6
1Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Background:
Randomized controlled trials with pragmatic intent aim to generate evidence that directly informs clinical decisions. Some have argued that the ethical protection of informed consent can be in tension with the goals of pragmatism. But the impact of other ethical protections on trial pragmatism has yet to be explored.
Purpose:
In this article, we analyze the relationship between additional ethical protections for vulnerable participants and the degree of pragmatism within the PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 (PRECIS-2) domains of trial design.
Methods:
We analyze three example trials with pragmatic intent that include vulnerable participants.
Conclusion:
The relationship between ethical protections and trial pragmatism is complex. In some cases, additional ethical protections for vulnerable participants can promote the pragmatism of some of the PRECIS-2 domains of trial design. When designing trials with pragmatic intent, researchers ought to look for opportunities wherein ethical protections enhance the degree of pragmatism.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethics in Research
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

