Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Why partisans feel hated: Distinct static and dynamic relationships with animosity meta-perceptions
Jeffrey Lees1,2, Mina Cikara3, James N Druckman4
1Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Abstract:
Partisans hold inaccurate perceptions of the other side. What drives these inaccuracies? We address this question with a focus on partisan animosity meta-perceptions (i.e. how much a partisan believes opposing partisans hate them). We argue that predictors can relate to meta-perceptions statically (e.g. at a specific point in time, do partisans who post more about politics on social media differ in their meta-perceptions relative to partisans who post less?) or dynamically (e.g. does a partisan who increases their social media political posting between two defined time points change their meta-perceptions accordingly?). Using panel data from the 2020 US presidential election, we find variables display distinct static and dynamic relationships with meta-perceptions. Notably, between individuals, posting online exhibits no (static) relationship with meta-perceptions, while within individuals, those who increased their postings over time (dynamically) became more accurate. The results make clear that overly general statements about meta-perceptions and their predictors, including social media activity, are bound to be wrong. How meta-perceptions relate to other factors often depends on contextual circumstances at a given time.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Attitudes
In- and Out-Groups
Group Polarization
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

