Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
How uncertainty in calibration data affects the modeling of non-point source pollutant loads in baseflow
Shuai Chen1, Wei Qin2, Tong Cui3
1School of Water Conservancy & Environment Engineering, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China; The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing.
None:
Baseflow is a major transport pathway for non-point source (NPS) pollutants. Watershed water quality (WWQ) models calibrated by low-quality data may produce misleading predictions of baseflow NPS pollutant loads, resulting in poor management decisions. We evaluated how models of the baseflow nitrate loads in the Huron River basin, southwest of Lake Erie, were affected by uncertainty in the calibration data. Based on a five-year time series of daily streamflow, nitrate concentration, and specific conductance, two sets of "observed" baseflow nitrate load data that include uncertainty were estimated using various tracer-based and non-tracer-based hydrograph separation methods, in conjunction with assumptions regarding baseflow nitrate concentrations. We calibrated the Soil and Water Assessment Tool plus (SWAT+) model with the two "observed" data sets and used the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) approach to quantify parameter and predictive uncertainties. The results showed that baseflow accounted for 26 %-34 % of the mean annual total streamflow (11.8 m3/s) and 8 %-37 % of the mean annual total nitrate load (14.3 kg·ha-1·year-1) in the Huron River basin. The baseflow and nitrate load estimates from the non-tracer-based methods resembled those from the tracer-based method but had greater uncertainty. The posterior parameter distributions, as well as the weighted means and 90 % prediction intervals of the simulated baseflow nitrate loads, exhibited minimal variation when different calibration data sets for SWAT+ and different threshold likelihood values for GLUE were used. Our analysis emphasizes the necessity of calibrating WWQ models with baseflow pollutant loads/concentrations when addressing water quality issues related to baseflow. It also demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing multiple non-tracer-based hydrograph separation methods to estimate baseflow NPS pollutant loads. These non-tracer-based methods offer a simplicity and broader applicability compared to tracer-based methods. This study has provided insights into how calibration data uncertainty impacts the modeling of NPS pollution in baseflow and highlights the practical value of non-tracer-based hydrograph separation methods.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Uncertainty: Overview
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Typical Model Studies
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

