Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
Published on: April 6, 2016
The contact lens-tear film interface: Investigating the tear envelope
Aisling M Mann1, James S Wolffsohn2, Graeme Young3
1Biomaterials Research Unit, School of Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Purpose:
To explore the complex interface between the tear film, a unique mucosal fluid which is fundamental to ocular homeostasis and optimal vision, and an in-situ contact lens. This study exploits the use of a unique tear envelope (TE) extraction technique, which harvests the material-influenced layer of tear film that is in intimate contact with the lens during wear, to specifically investigate the influence of contact lens wear on tear film protein dynamics.
Methods:
TEs were collected from freshly removed worn lens using a novel microcentrifuge 'piggyback' technique. Two distinct ex vivo studies were performed to investigate the key influencing factors involved. Non lens-wearing tear samples were also collected from all wearers. A compositional protein profile for each TE and tear film (TF) sample was obtained using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer lab-on-a-chip microfluidic assay which detected proteins in a 14-230 kDa range.
Results:
The data demonstrated that the TE protein compositional profile was quite distinct from either that of tear components deposited on the lens or those held in the tear menisci. For example, for one of the participant subgroups the tear protein average values in tears (n = 39) were determined at 35.2 ± 2.5 % lysozyme, 17.2 ± 0.6 % lipocalin, 7.3 ± 1.6 % IgA, 20.3 ± 1.3 % lactoferrin and 0.4 ± 0.4 % albumin as a function of total protein detected. In contrast, the average TE values were measured at 49.2 ± 3.7 %, 21.3 ± 3.9 %, 7.8 ± 1.6 % and 10.2 ± 1.7 % and 1.3 ± 2.8 % respectively with omafilcon A wear. In addition, 63 % of all TE samples (n = 180) (wearing lotrafilcon B and omafilcon A lenses) were albumin positive compared with only 19 % of all pre-lens insertion tear film samples (n = 237).
Conclusions:
The TE approach not only allows material differentiation, but it can determine changes in the ocular host response that may otherwise be missed by sole non lens-wearing tear film sample analysis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy

