Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Surgical Retrieval, Isolation and In vitro Expansion of Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament-derived Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications
Published on: April 30, 2014
Hop to It! A Systematic Review and Longitudinal Meta-analysis of Hop Performance After ACL Reconstruction
Michael A Girdwood1, Kay M Crossley2, Ebonie K Rio2,3,4
1La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia. m.girdwood@latrobe.edu.au.
Background:
Hop testing is widely used by clinicians to monitor rehabilitation and decide when to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the trajectory of long-term hop performance has not been summarised.
Objective:
To investigate hop performance change over time after ACLR.
Design:
Systematic review with longitudinal meta-analysis.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus to 28 February 2023.
Eligibility Criteria:
Studies with ≥ 50 participants following primary ACLR, with mean participant age of 18-40 years, reporting a quantitative measure of hop performance (e.g. single forward hop distance). Results had to be reported for the ACLR limb and compared with (1) the contralateral limb (within person) and/or (2) an uninjured control limb (between person).
Results:
We included 136 studies of 23,360 participants. Performance was similar across different hop tests, with steep initial improvements in within-person symmetry, tailing off after 18-24 months. ACLR limb hop performance was 5-10% lower compared with the contralateral limb at 1 year post-surgery, with largest deficits observed for vertical hop [87.0% contralateral limb (95% CI 85.3-88.8) compared with single forward hop 93.8% (95% CI 92.8-94.9)]. By 3-5 years, results were similar between ACLR and contralateral limbs. There were limited data for between-person comparisons (n = 17 studies). Exploratory analyses showed deficits in all forward hopping tests to be very strongly correlated with each other [e.g. single forward and triple hop rho = 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-0.99)], though there was discordance in the relationship between single forward hop and vertical hop performance [rho = 0.27 (95% CI - 0.53 to 0.79)].
Conclusions:
Hop performance is comparable to the uninjured limb by 3-5 years post-ACLR, with the greatest deficits in within-person symmetry present in vertical and side hop tests. Assessment of hopping in multiple planes and comparison with uninjured controls, may provide the most complete evaluation of functional performance.
More Related Videos
06:27Author Spotlight: Investigating Early Events and Long-Term Effects of ACL Injuries for Osteoarthritis Progression
Published on: September 29, 2023
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Leaky Scanning
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
Mass Analyzers: Overview
Interpreting Run Charts
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving