Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

8.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
8.7K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

282
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
282
Sampling Continuous Time Signal01:11

Sampling Continuous Time Signal

211
In signal processing, a continuous-time signal can be sampled using an impulse-train sampling technique, followed by the zero-order hold method. Impulse-train sampling involves the use of a periodic impulse train, which consists of a series of delta functions spaced at regular intervals determined by the sampling period. When a continuous-time signal is multiplied by this impulse train, it generates impulses with amplitudes corresponding to the signal's values at the sampling points.
In the...
211
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

169
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
169

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different brain regions support deliberation during food choice in disordered and healthy eating.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Conscious and nonconscious thought: Insights from the neuroscience of decision-making.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Learning reinforces curiosity for related information.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Human exploration strategically balances approaching and avoiding uncertainty.

eLife·2026
Same author

Sequential sampling from memory underlies perceptual decisions unyoked from actions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The inferred value of unchosen options spreads to related items in memory.

Cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K

Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.

Ariel Zylberberg1, Akram Bakkour1,2,3, Daphna Shohamy1,4,5

  • 1Mortimer B Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|October 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Subjective values change during decision-making. A novel algorithm, Reval, shows these value changes better explain choices and brain activity than stable values, challenging existing models.

More Related Videos

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroeconomics

Background:

  • Decision-making often assumes stable item values, with inconsistencies attributed to random noise.
  • Bounded Evidence Accumulation (BEA) models perceptual decisions using temporally uncorrelated noise.
  • This assumption may not hold for value-based decisions where internal states fluctuate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if subjective item values change during a decision-making task.
  • To develop and apply a novel algorithm (Reval) to detect and quantify value changes.
  • To assess if dynamic values improve models of choice and response time.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of existing snack choice data using the Reval algorithm.
  • Comparison of Reval-derived values against explicitly stated values.
  • Modeling choice and response times with dynamic versus static value assumptions.
  • Correlation of value changes with brain activity (BOLD signal) in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Main Results:

  • Subjective item values were found to change significantly within a short experimental session.
  • Reval-derived dynamic values provided a better explanation of choice and response times than static values.
  • Dynamic value changes also better explained neural activity in value-related brain regions.
  • A modified BEA model incorporating non-independent evidence samples supported the revaluation concept.

Conclusions:

  • Subjective values are not static but dynamically revalued during preference choices.
  • Revaluation is a key factor in value-based decision-making, influencing choices and neural representations.
  • Existing models of decision-making may need to incorporate dynamic value construction for greater accuracy.