Single-Incision Direct Lateral Approach Versus Dual-Incision Approach for Distal Tibial and Fibular Fractures

Distal tibial and fibular fractures are typically the result of high-energy trauma. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are often used to reconstruct and reduce displaced fractures, especially intra-articular ones. These fractures can be addressed either by a dual-incision approach (medial approach for the distal tibia and lateral approach for the fibula) or by a single-incision direct lateral approach to fix both the tibia and fibula. The direct lateral approach avoids injury to the medial soft tissues. This study was conducted to compare the postoperative clinico-radiological and functional outcomes of the single-incision direct lateral approach and the dual-incision approach for distal tibial and fibular fractures.

A prospective comparative cohort study of 40 patients was conducted. The patients were classified into two cohorts of 20 each based on the surgical approach: those who underwent a single-incision direct lateral approach and those who underwent a dual-incision approach for distal tibial and fibular fractures (procedure: ORIF with plating). The study was conducted from September 2022 to March 2024. A follow-up period of at least 12 months was carried out, comparing operative time, discharge time, and postoperative outcomes using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, ankle range of motion (ROM), Southampton wound score for wound healing, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and periodic radiographs at each follow-up. Complications were also studied.

The mean operative time was 95.06 ± 7.04 minutes for the single-incision approach and 109.89 ± 7.88 minutes for the dual-incision approach. The average blood loss was 202.41 ± 32.76 mL for the single-incision approach and 248.39 ± 28.18 mL for the dual-incision approach. The hospital stay was shorter in the direct lateral approach group, and the AOFAS score at 12 months was better in the direct lateral approach group (91.47 ± 2.55 for the single-incision approach vs. 83.33 ± 8.71 for the dual-incision approach). Postoperative wound healing was observed, and the Southampton wound score was compared. Overall, soft tissue complications were fewer in the direct lateral approach group. The postoperative VAS pain score was consistently lower in the single-incision direct lateral approach group, which also demonstrated better ankle ROM. The p-value was significant (<0.05) for these parameters. At the six-month follow-up, all patients exhibited clinical and radiographic healing and bone union, except for one case in the dual-incision group. A medial compound wound, treated by plastic surgery with flap cover intervention, was identified as one of the definitive indications for single-incision plating.

The single-incision approach was associated with better soft tissue healing, fewer wound complications, and superior ankle functional outcomes compared to the dual-incision approach.