Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mediastinal masses: MR imaging.

G K von Schulthess, K McMurdo, D Tscholakoff

    Radiology
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Coronary artery stenosis: detection with contrast-enhanced MR imaging in dogs.

    Radiology·1995
    Same author

    Primary bone tumors: value of MR angiography for preoperative planning and monitoring response to chemotherapy.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1995
    Same author

    Assessment of popliteal arterial occlusive disease with 2D time-of-flight MRA.

    Journal of computer assisted tomography·1995
    Same author

    The developing role of magnetic resonance contrast media in the detection of ischemic heart disease.

    Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.)·1995
    Same author

    Evaluation of mitral stenosis with velocity-encoded cine-magnetic resonance imaging.

    The American journal of cardiology·1995
    Same author

    Assessment of valvular heart disease by magnetic resonance imaging.

    American heart journal·1995
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging effectively visualizes mediastinal masses, their impact on surrounding structures, and offers insights into mass composition. This noninvasive technique provides comparable anatomical detail to computed tomography (CT) but with added diagnostic value.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Oncology

    Background:

    • Mediastinal masses present diagnostic challenges.
    • Accurate characterization is crucial for patient management.
    • Noninvasive imaging modalities are preferred for evaluating these masses.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in characterizing mediastinal masses.
    • To compare MR imaging with computed tomography (CT) for assessing mediastinal masses.
    • To determine if MR imaging can provide insights into the tissue composition of mediastinal masses.

    Main Methods:

    • Seventy-five patients with mediastinal masses underwent MR imaging.
    • MR imaging parameters included T1 and T2 relaxation values, hydrogen density, and contrast relative to muscle/fat.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • MR images were compared with CT scans in 45 patients.

    • Main Results:

    • MR imaging successfully depicted all mediastinal masses and their encroachment on vessels and airways.
    • MR demonstrated superior assessment of vascular compromise compared to CT.
    • Distinct T1 and T2 relaxation values differentiated bronchogenic carcinoma from chronic inflammatory processes and other neoplasms.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging is a noninvasive and effective tool for evaluating mediastinal masses.
    • MR provides anatomical information comparable to CT.
    • MR imaging offers additional value by providing insights into the composition of mediastinal masses, aiding in differential diagnosis.