Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

272
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
272
Divergence and Stokes' Theorems01:06

Divergence and Stokes' Theorems

1.5K
The divergence and Stokes' theorems are a variation of Green's theorem in a higher dimension. They are also a generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus. The divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem are in a way similar to each other; The divergence theorem relates to the dot product of a vector, while Stokes' theorem relates to the curl of a vector. Many applications in physics and engineering make use of the divergence and Stokes' theorems, enabling us to write...
1.5K
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

2.6K
The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...
2.6K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

131
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
131
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transition from independent midwifery care to Early Prevention Network Services in Germany - a cross-sectional survey.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Inconsistency was more prevalent than reported: an empirical study of 57 networks with multiple treatments using the node-splitting approach and a novel interpretation index.

Systematic reviews·2025
Same author

Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Airflowing in Cleaning Implant Surfaces in a Surgical Peri-Implantitis Treatment Simulation-A Laboratory Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2025
Same author

Efficacy of Air Powder Water-Jet Devices in Cleaning Implant Surfaces in a Non-Surgical Peri-Implantitis Treatment Simulation-A Laboratory Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2025
Same author

Exploring the Transitivity Assumption in Network Meta-Analysis: A Novel Approach and Its Implications.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Statistical Heterogeneity in Oral Health Meta-Analyses.

Journal of dental research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma
15:07

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma

Published on: December 28, 2015

26.6K

Local inconsistency detection using the Kullback-Leibler divergence measure.

Loukia M Spineli1

  • 1Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625, Germany. Spineli.Loukia@mh-hannover.de.

Systematic Reviews
|October 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel framework using Kullback-Leibler divergence to assess local inconsistency in network meta-analysis. The method effectively identifies comparisons with acceptably low inconsistency, outperforming traditional statistical tests.

Keywords:
ConsistencyInformation lossKullback–Leibler divergenceNetwork meta-analysis

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Measuring Local Tissue Strains in Tendons via Open-Source Digital Image Correlation
07:50

Measuring Local Tissue Strains in Tendons via Open-Source Digital Image Correlation

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma
15:07

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma

Published on: December 28, 2015

26.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Measuring Local Tissue Strains in Tendons via Open-Source Digital Image Correlation
07:50

Measuring Local Tissue Strains in Tendons via Open-Source Digital Image Correlation

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Standard methods for local inconsistency assessment in network meta-analysis often use statistical tests with low power.
  • These tests can lead to misinterpretation, where a non-significant p-value is incorrectly taken as evidence of consistency.
  • There is a need for more robust methods to reliably evaluate inconsistency in treatment comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a novel framework for interpreting local inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
  • To utilize Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) to quantify the discrepancy between direct and indirect evidence.
  • To establish a more reliable method for distinguishing between acceptably low and material inconsistency.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework based on average Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) between direct and indirect effect estimates.
  • Calculated average KLD using means and standard errors (or posterior means/standard deviations) from local inconsistency models.
  • Applied a semi-objective threshold to KLD values to classify inconsistency as low or material, demonstrated in three study networks.

Main Results:

  • Traditional statistical tests showed minimal significant inconsistency across selected comparisons.
  • The KLD framework identified 14%, 66%, and 75% of comparisons with acceptably low inconsistency in the respective networks.
  • Greater information loss was observed when approximating indirect estimate distributions with direct ones, due to indirect estimates' imprecision.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed KLD-based framework effectively differentiates comparisons with acceptably low from material inconsistency.
  • This approach provides a valuable tool when traditional statistical tests for inconsistency yield inconclusive results.
  • The concept of information loss, quantified by KLD, offers a more nuanced interpretation of evidence consistency.