Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

06:08
A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling
Published on: September 15, 2017
23.3K
Case Volume Is Not Associated With Outcomes After Adrenalectomy Performed by Urologic Surgeons
Courtney Yong1, Alexander Kim2, James E Slaven3
1Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Urology Practice
|October 18, 2024
Summary
High-volume surgeons did not show better outcomes for adrenalectomy compared to low-volume surgeons. Patient outcomes were similar across surgeon experience levels for this specific procedure.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Outcomes
- Adrenal Gland Surgery
Background:
- Surgeon volume is often considered a critical factor influencing surgical outcomes.
- The impact of surgeon experience, specifically adrenalectomy volume, on patient outcomes requires further investigation.
- Understanding the relationship between surgeon volume and adrenalectomy results is crucial for patient care and surgical training.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the surgical outcomes of adrenalectomy between low-volume and high-volume urologists.
- To evaluate the influence of surgeon experience on procedure length, blood loss, length of stay, and complication rates.
- To determine if extensive experience in renal surgery translates to better adrenalectomy outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 304 adrenalectomies performed between 2009 and 2023 at a single center.
- Patients were stratified into low-volume (< 1-4 adrenalectomies/year) and high-volume (15 adrenalectomies/year) surgeon groups.
- Outcomes including procedure time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and Clavien-Dindo complications were analyzed using multivariable regression.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in procedure time, estimated blood loss, positive margin rates, or length of stay between high- and low-volume surgeons.
- The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the low-volume group (13.5%) compared to the high-volume group (5.3%) (P = .01).
- However, severe complications (Clavien 3 or higher) did not differ significantly between the groups (4% vs 1%, P = .22).
Conclusions:
- Surgical volume may not be a determining factor for adrenalectomy outcomes when performed by urologists with extensive retroperitoneal surgery experience.
- Outcomes appear comparable between high- and low-volume adrenalectomy surgeons in specialized, high-volume centers.
- Further research may explore the specific skills and experience in related retroperitoneal procedures that contribute to successful adrenalectomy outcomes regardless of adrenalectomy-specific volume.

