Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025
Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
The IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT): multicenter pig study on the effect of
Petra Kleinbongard1, Carlos Galán Arriola2, Lina Badimon3
1Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Essen Medical School, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. petra.kleinbongard@uk-essen.de.
Abstract:
Numerous cardioprotective interventions have been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size (IS) in pre-clinical studies. However, their translation for the benefit of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been largely disappointing. One reason for the lack of translation is the lack of rigor and reproducibility in pre-clinical studies. To address this, we have established the European IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) pig AMI network with centralized randomization and blinded core laboratory IS analysis and validated the network with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) as a positive control. Ten sites in the COST Innovators Grant (IG16225) network participated in the IMPACT network. Three sites were excluded from the final analysis through quality control of infarct images and use of pre-defined exclusion criteria. Using a centrally generated randomization list, pigs were allocated to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R, N = 5/site) or IPC + I/R (N = 5/site). The primary endpoint was IS [% area-at-risk (AAR)], as quantified by triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining in a centralized, blinded core laboratory (5 sites), or IS [% left-ventricular mass (LV)], as quantified by a centralized, blinded cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) core laboratory (2 sites). In pooled analyses, IPC significantly reduced IS when compared to I/R (57 ± 14 versus 32 ± 19 [%AAR] N = 25 pigs/group; p < 0.001; 25 ± 13 versus 14 ± 8 [%LV]; N = 10 pigs/group; p = 0.021). In site-specific analyses, in 4 of the 5 sites, IS was significantly reduced by IPC when compared to I/R when quantified by TTC and in 1 of 2 sites when quantified by CMR. A pig AMI multicenter European network with centralized randomization and core blinded IS analysis was established and validated with the aim to improve the reproducibility of cardioprotective interventions in pre-clinical studies and the translation of cardioprotection for patient benefit.
