Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Transdermal Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Mechanically Ventilated Piglets
Published on: September 13, 2022
Potential New Methods to Analyze Basal and Total Endogenous Protein Losses of Host and Bacterial Origin in Pigs
Lonneke Noorman1, Bart van der Hee2, Walter Jj Gerrits3
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background:
Current systems for assessing protein quality such as the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score correct apparent amino acid (AA) digestibility for basal endogenous protein losses (bEPL), ignoring the potential influence of the diet on these losses. However, the quantification of total endogenous protein losses (tEPL) poses a challenge.
Objectives:
To evaluate different methods for quantifying tEPL and bEPL, and to assess their potential in discriminating between tEPL originating from bacteria and host.
Methods:
Using an incomplete Youden square design, 12 ileal cannulated pigs received 10 different protein sources, and a nitrogen-free (NF) diet. Ileal digesta were collected on days 6 and 7 of each 1-wk feeding period, to quantify endogenous protein losses (EPL) and analyze apparent ileal digestibility. Ileal EPL were estimated based on 1) 16S-+18S gene copy quantitative polymerase chain reaction, 2) diaminopimelic acid (DAPA)+18S, 3) differential AA profiles in digesta, EPL, and bacteria, equaling tEPL, and 4) an NF diet and 5) whey protein isolate (WPI), equaling bEPL.
Results:
Ileal bEPL based on the NF and WPI method correlated moderately to highly (r = 0.69, P < 0.05), but the NF method probably underestimated bEPL. In pigs fed the WPI diet, EPL based on the WPI and AA profile method were highly correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.01). Overall, tEPL based on the AA profile method were moderately correlated with the 16S+18S method (r = 0.58, P < 0.001), and DAPA+18S (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Low correlations were observed between bacterial tEPL based on the AA profile method and 16S or DAPA. Host tEPL based on the AA profile method and 18S were weakly correlated (r = 0.39, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The AA profile method seems the most appropriate method for tEPL quantification, whereas the WPI method is preferred for bEPL quantification. Despite challenges in distinguishing between bacterial and host EPL, it is evident that bacterial proteins substantially (on average 37%-83%, depending on method) contribute to the EPL.
More Related Videos
09:45Author Spotlight: Detecting Low-Abundant Host Cell Proteins in Drug Products Using Enrichment Beads and Limited Digestion
Published on: January 19, 2024
05:52Author Spotlight: Induction of Experimental Endotoxemic Shock in Pigs for Studying Hemodynamic and Respiratory Failure
Published on: December 8, 2023