Dimensional assessment on baseline MRI of soft-tissue sarcomas: longest diameter, sum and product of diameters, and volume-which is the best measurement method to predict patients' outcomes?

  • 0Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via GC Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The longest diameter (LD) is the most effective metric for predicting metastasis-free survival in lower limb soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Other dimensional measurements showed similar prognostic value but LD offers the best balance of simplicity and performance.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Surgical Pathology

Background

  • The longest diameter (LD) is a recognized prognostic factor for soft-tissue sarcoma (STS).
  • Alternative dimensional assessments like sum of diameters (SoD), product of diameters (PoD), and 3D-COG volume exist but their comparative prognostic value against LD is unknown.
  • Accurate prognostication is crucial for tailoring treatment strategies in STS patients.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To compare the prognostic performance of LD, SoD, PoD, and 3D-COG in predicting metastasis-free survival (MFS) for lower limb STS.
  • To evaluate the utility of these dimensional assessments in improving patient prognostication.
  • To assess the reproducibility of these measurements.

Main Methods

  • Retrospective analysis of 382 adult patients with newly diagnosed lower limb STS treated with curative intent.
  • Multivariable Cox regression models were developed using LD, PoD, SoD, or 3D-COG, with adjustment for clinical covariates.
  • Model performance was compared using concordance indices (c-indices) in a validation cohort; measurement reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Main Results

  • All dimensional measurements were associated with lower metastasis-free survival (MFS).
  • The product of diameters (PoD) model showed the highest concordance index in both training and validation cohorts, though not significantly superior to the longest diameter (LD) model.
  • No dimensional measurement was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) or local relapse-free survival (LFS); all demonstrated excellent measurement reproducibility (ICC > 0.95).

Conclusions

  • The longest diameter (LD) is the most suitable metric for integration into prognostic models and nomograms for predicting metastasis-free survival in lower limb soft-tissue sarcoma.
  • While other dimensional measurements offer comparable prognostic information, LD provides the optimal balance of simplicity and predictive performance.
  • Further research may explore the combined utility of LD with other clinical factors for enhanced prognostication.